Donald Trump’s win shows the need to build a world where “racism and hatred is rejected”, London Mayor Sadiq Khan said.
The mayor and the US president-elect have had a long-running feud dating back to before Mr Trump’s first term in the White House.
After Mr Trump claimed victory over Kamala Harris on Wednesday, Mr Khan said he understands “many Londoners will be anxious” and “fearful about what it will mean for democracy and for women’s rights”.
He said they may also have concerns about what a Trump victory means for “the situation in the Middle East or the fate of Ukraine”, while “others will be worried about the future of Nato or tackling the climate crisis”.
Mr Khan said: “London is – and will always be – for everyone. We will always be pro-women, pro-diversity, pro-climate and pro-human rights.
“London is a place where we’re proud of our diversity, proud of the contribution of all our communities and proud of our spirit of unity. These are some of the values that will continue to bind us together as Londoners.
“The lesson of today is that progress is not inevitable.
“But asserting our progressive values is more important than ever – re-committing to building a world where racism and hatred is rejected, the fundamental rights of women and girls are upheld, and where we continue to tackle the crisis of climate change head on.”
An important reminder today for Londoners: our city is – and will always be – for everyone.
We will always be pro-women, pro-diversity, pro-climate and pro-human rights.
These are some of the values that will continue to bind us together as Londoners.
— Sadiq Khan (@SadiqKhan) November 6, 2024
Mr Khan’s spat with Mr Trump dates back to at least 2015, when the Labour politician condemned the then presidential hopeful’s suggestion that Muslims should be banned from travelling to the US.
After Mr Khan’s election in 2016, the mayor described Mr Trump’s views on Islam as “ignorant”, prompting the US tycoon to challenge him to an IQ test.
The spat intensified following the 2017 London Bridge terror attack when Mr Trump said: “At least seven dead and 48 wounded in terror attack and Mayor of London says there is ‘no reason to be alarmed!’.”
Mr Khan had actually said the public should not be alarmed by an increased police presence in the wake of the atrocity.
The mayor’s spokesman said Mr Khan had “more important things to do than respond to Donald Trump’s ill-informed tweet”.
But Mr Trump claimed the mayor’s explanation of the comment was a “pathetic excuse”.
.@SadiqKhan, who by all accounts has done a terrible job as Mayor of London, has been foolishly “nasty” to the visiting President of the United States, by far the most important ally of the United Kingdom. He is a stone cold loser who should focus on crime in London, not me……
— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) June 3, 2019
In 2018, Mr Khan’s office gave permission for an inflatable depicting Mr Trump as a baby to fly in Parliament Square as the US president visited the UK.
On the eve of his visit, the president told The Sun Mr Khan had “done a very bad job on terrorism”.
In June 2019, during Mr Trump’s official state visit to the UK, the president reignited the row before even setting foot on British soil.
Moments before he stepped off the plane, the president tweeted that Mr Khan “has done a terrible job as Mayor of London” and was “a stone cold loser who should focus on crime in London, not me”.
Mr Khan responded: “I’m not 12 years old in a playground, I’m just surprised Donald Trump thinks he is.”
Later that month, Mr Trump said Mr Khan was “a disaster” and a “national disgrace” after a spate of violence in London, where three men were killed in separate attacks in less than 24 hours.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here