A man said to be the first person charged with “dognapping” has denied the more serious charge of burglary after a dog was stolen and a woman left seriously hurt.
Julian Mead, 40, is accused of taking a dog on October 1 after emergency services were called to Bells Lane in Cinderhill, Nottingham, shortly before 9.30pm where a woman was found with serious injuries.
The defendant, of Welstead Avenue in Aspley, Nottingham, appeared at Nottingham Crown Court on Thursday charged with attempted murder, grievous bodily harm, possession of an offensive weapon – namely a hammer – and burglary.
He pleaded not guilty to all four charges.
The woman, aged in her 40s, was taken to hospital but Nottinghamshire Police said her injuries were “not life-threatening” and the dog, a British bulldog called Winnie, was reported missing later from an adjacent property.
Last month, the force said Mead was charged with taking a dog so as to keep it from the person with lawful control, or “dognapping”, and that this was the first such charge since the Pet Abduction Act (2024) came into force in August.
The offence carries a maximum sentence of five years in prison, while burglary is punishable by up to 14 years in prison.
Mead, who wore a prison-issue grey sweatshirt, appeared in court by video link from HMP Nottingham and spoke only to confirm his name and enter his pleas.
Judge Stuart Rafferty KC remanded the defendant in custody until his trial on March 24 at the same court.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article