A Conservative peer has suggested that policies are being “Taylor-ed Swift-ly” under the new Labour Government, following changes to the ministerial code.
As members of the upper chamber debated the Chancellor’s Budget, Lord Dobbs suggested some workers are “luckier than others”.
“Some can find a helpful handout, the odd football ticket, occasional concert ticket, even a friendly local clothes bank,” he added.
The ministerial code was updated last week, with the Prime Minister’s ethics adviser now able to launch investigations into wrongdoing by ministers without his consent.
It comes after Sir Keir Starmer and some of his Cabinet ministers were involved in a donations row for accepting gifts, including free Taylor Swift concert tickets and clothing paid for by a donor.
During the debate, the House of Cards author argued there would be “fewer” workers following the Budget, adding: “You cannot raise £40 billion without hammering ordinary people.”
Opening his contribution on Monday, Lord Dobbs admitted: “I thought some of our budgets were pretty rubbish over the years.”
He went on to say: “Labour of course is the party of the workers, for the workers, ‘up the workers’. Trouble is, there are going to be fewer workers as a result of this Budget.
“You cannot raise £40 billion without hammering ordinary people. The increase in national insurance is going to be passed on to employees, no matter what the Chancellor has offered.
“In ordinary English that means lower pay, slower hiring, fewer jobs, and fewer workers. It’s sad, it’s unintended I’m sure, but it’s inevitable.
“But this is a Government of change, they’ve said that; perhaps they will change this?
“After all they changed their chief of staff pretty quickly.”
He added: “Some workers, of course, are luckier than others, some can find a helpful handout, the odd football ticket, occasional concert ticket, even a friendly local clothes bank.
“That was something else that was changed of course, once it all became public, another policy, how can I put it, that seems to have been Taylor-ed Swift-ly to the moment.”
The peer also criticised the Government’s plans for freeports, saying: “Did you notice they changed their policy on freeports?
“Two days before the Budget, Prime Minister announced they would create five new freeports, I thought that was rather a good idea personally, but then that policy changed too.
“No new freeports at all. A Number 10 official explained what had happened: they had misread the email from next door, it was in his quoted words ‘a total cock-up’ – no change there then.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel