Sir Keir Starmer has said he totally disagrees with suggestions by one of Tony Blair’s ex-advisers that the Government should do battle with farmers in the way Margaret Thatcher did with striking miners.
Former political adviser John McTernan claimed small family farms were an “industry we could do without” and signalled he was personally in favour of ministers engaging in a confrontation with farmers who plan to protest about changes to inheritance tax (IHT) relief.
The remarks were quickly seized upon by senior Tories, with former home secretary James Cleverly describing Mr McTernan as a Labour insider “saying the quiet bit out loud”.
But Sir Keir distanced himself from the Blair-era aide’s comments when asked if they reflected his thoughts on farmers.
Speaking to reporters in Baku while attending the Cop29 conference on climate change, the Prime Minister said: “No, I totally disagree.
“I’m absolutely committed to supporting our farmers.
“I said that before the election and I say it after the election.
“That is why, in our Budget… I was very pleased that we are investing £5 billion of our budget over the next two years into farming.
“That is really important for our farmers and I will do everything I can to support them because I think it is important that they not only prosper but prosper well into the future.
“So I totally disagree with those comments.”
Changes to IHT relief announced at the Budget mean farmers will have to pay tax on any property or land they pass on to their descendants worth more than £1 million.
A rate of 20% of anything above this will be charged, which the Treasury has claimed will affect roughly a quarter of farmers.
But the National Farmers’ Union (NFU) has warned that plans to roll together allowances for both IHT relief and business property relief could leave far more agricultural businesses exposed to the tax.
The Countryside Land and Business Association meanwhile says some average-sized farms will have to pay more than they make in profits each year to cover the costs of the tax, warning this could lead to land sell-offs.
The NFU is planning a mass lobby event in London on November 19 against the changes, and a splinter protest event is also expected to take place.
Speaking to GB News about the demonstrations, Mr McTernan said: “I am personally in favour if farmers want to go on the streets, we can do what Margaret Thatcher did to the miners.”
He steered away from whether this would mean a heavy-handed policing response, but added: “It is an industry we could do without.”
“If people are so upset that they want to go on the streets and spray slurry on them, then we don’t need the small farmers,” added Mr McTernan, who plays no role in the current Government.
“Labour insider saying the quiet bit out loud!” Tory former minister Mr Cleverly wrote on X, formerly Twitter, as he shared the GB News clip of Mr McTernan.
Rupert Lowe, the Reform UK MP for Great Yarmouth, described the remarks as “offensive, incorrect, deluded”, and said he hoped to see an apology soon.
It is 40 years since the 1984-85 miners’ strike, in which the Thatcher government and the National Union of Miners engaged in a year-long battle over attempts to close collieries up and down the country.
Pit closures and job losses which resulted from the strike continue to have an impact on so-called left behind, formerly industrialised areas of the UK.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel