A victim of serial abuser John Smyth has said the Archbishop of Canterbury’s resignation paves the way for others to be held accountable.
Justin Welby said he would be stepping down less than a week after an independent review concluded that the most prolific serial abuser to be associated with the Church of England might have been brought to justice had the Archbishop formally reported him to police more than a decade ago.
More than 100 boys and young men were abused by late barrister Smyth over five decades.
One of his victims, Richard Gittins, said bishops “who kept the stories to themselves” should now be the focus of questioning.
After Mr Welby publicly announced he was stepping down, Mr Gittins told Sky News: “I’m pleased he’s resigned.
“It now shows that he’s taken some action, and I think this also means that the focus can be turned on other people who knew and haven’t done anything about it.
“So he’s moved away, so that other people can answer the questions that need to be put to them, particularly bishops.
“Although he’s the highest person in the church, he’s not the most responsible for the cover-up.
“So I think it’s time now to focus the attention on other bishops who kept the stories to themselves.”
He added that the Archbishop’s resignation does not make up for the years of abuse inflicted on people by Smyth, and the subsequent “cover-up”.
“But I’m pleased that (Mr Welby has) resigned because it shows that he’s seriously sorry. And it’s not just words anymore – he’s leading with action,” Mr Gittins said.
Another victim of Smyth, Andrew Morse, has said he was subjected to after-prayer beatings as a boy between 1978 and 1982.
Mr Morse said he first met Smyth while a pupil at Winchester College, Hampshire, and told the Telegraph that the Archbishop had taken a “brave step” by resigning.
He hoped Mr Welby would “find some peace” in his decision, and told the newspaper: “I welcome (his resignation) wholeheartedly.
“I think it’s a brave step that he’s taken and that I hope he finds some peace in this decision as I know myself and other victims will.”
Mr Morse added that it would “bring some measure of closure” to victims, and said: “Obviously he’s just the leader and there are countless other Anglican churchmen who equally bear responsibility.
“But I think by taking this step, he’s providing an example for them whether they follow it or not.”
Hours before Mr Welby announced his resignation, Mr Morse told BBC Radio 4’s Today programme that Smyth’s abuse led him to attempt suicide.
He added that the Archbishop’s admission that he had not done enough since 2013 “is enough in my mind to confirm that Justin Welby along with countless other Anglican church members were part of a cover-up about the abuse”.
Over five decades between the 1970s until his death, Smyth is said to have subjected as many as 130 boys and young men in the UK and Africa to traumatic physical, sexual, psychological and spiritual attacks, permanently marking their lives.
A lay reader who led Christian summer camps, Smyth died aged 75 in Cape Town in 2018 while under investigation by Hampshire Police, and was “never brought to justice for the abuse”, the Makin Review said.
Mr Welby knew Smyth because of his attendance at Iwerne Christian camps in the 1970s, but the review said there was no evidence that he had “maintained any significant contact” with the barrister in later years.
The Archbishop said he had “no idea or suspicion of this abuse” before 2013.
The report said Smyth “could and should have been formally reported to the police in the UK, and to authorities in South Africa (church authorities and potentially the police) by church officers, including a diocesan bishop and Justin Welby in 2013″.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel