Spy-accused former soldier Daniel Khalife had a 30-minute phone conversation with an Iranian agent while posted at a US army base, a court has heard.
The three calls “rekindled” Iran’s interest in Khalife as an intelligence asset, Woolwich Crown Court was told.
Khalife, who has pleaded guilty to escaping from prison, is accused of collecting secret information and passing it to agents of the Middle Eastern country while serving in the Royal Corps of Signals.
The 23-year-old was posted to Fort Cavazos (then called Fort Hood) in Texas between February and April 2021, where he took part in a joint exercise, his trial heard.
He told his Iranian contacts he was at the base, but denied providing them any “specific details” or useful information about what he was doing there.
“The narratives that I told in those phone calls were false,” Khalife told jurors.
Khalife said the Iranian intelligence services already knew he was in the United States by tracking his location from his phone.
“They know automatically where I am anyway,” he said.
The former soldier told the court he had to “walk quite a while” before he could find any signal at the 214,000-acre site, and the “operation was over” at the time of the calls.
While in Texas, Khalife took photos on his phone of passwords, a floppy disk and a USB stick used to access sensitive military communications systems, but denied sending them on to Iranian agents.
Prosecutor Mark Heywood KC said the phone conversation with an Iranian agent, known only as “David 2”, had “rekindled their interest” in him.
Khalife denies charges contrary to the Official Secrets Act and Terrorism Act, and claims he wanted to work as a double agent.
He also denies perpetrating a bomb hoax.
The trial continues.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article