Sir Keir Starmer resisted pressure from an Independent MP during Prime Minister’s Questions to describe the war in Gaza as “genocide”.
When asked for his definition of the word, Sir Keir told the Commons he was “well aware of the definition of genocide, and that is why I have never described this as, and referred to it as, genocide”.
His comments came in response to a question from Ayoub Khan, who argued that “genocide is not about numbers, it’s about intent”.
Mr Khan, MP for Birmingham Perry Barr, said: “Article two of the United Nations genocide convention makes it explicitly clear that genocide is not about numbers, it’s about intent.
“And the intent of the Israeli government and the IDF (Israeli Defence Force) has been explicitly clear in words and in actions over the past 400 days, more than 45,000 innocent men, women and children killed.
“On October 28, the Foreign Secretary denied that a genocide is even taking place and suggested that the Israeli army had not yet killed enough Palestinians to constitute a genocide.
“And last week at PMQs, the Prime Minister started that he has never referred to the atrocities happening in Gaza as a genocide. Will the Prime Minister share his definition of genocide with this House?
“And will he state what further action he’s prepared to take to save the lives of desperate and starving men, women and children? Given that we now hold presidency of the United Nations Security Council.”
The Prime Minister replied: “It would be wise to start a question like that by reference to what happened in October of last year.
“I’m well aware of the definition of genocide, and that is why I have never described this as, and referred to it as, genocide.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel