Chancellor Rachel Reeves has said she is “going for growth” with a shake-up of the pensions market that will unlock tens of billions of pounds of investment in business and infrastructure.
Here is a look at what has been said about the plans for pension “megafunds” being outlined on Thursday in Ms Reeves’s first Mansion House speech as Chancellor.
– What is happening under the plans?
Reforms will be introduced under a new Pension Schemes Bill next year, consolidating defined contribution (DC) schemes and pooling assets from 86 local government pension scheme authorities.
There are around 60 different multi-employer schemes, each investing savers’ money into one or more funds. The Government will consult on setting a minimum size requirement for these funds.
– Why does the Government think the reforms are a good idea?
It has said the changes could unlock around £80 billion of investment for infrastructure projects and businesses, helping to boost economic growth.
The funds will take advantage of their size and use economies of scale, potentially helping to boost DC savers’ pension pots.
The Government said analysis indicates that pension funds start to return greater productive investment levels once the size of assets they manage reaches between £25 to £50 billion.
The schemes will mirror similar set-ups in Australia and Canada.
– What has been the experience of such initiatives overseas?
Jon Greer, head of retirement policy at wealth manager Quilter, said: “Interestingly, while Canada has very large pension schemes, they too are looking for ways to increase domestic investment.
“Currently, roughly 7% of Canadian scheme infrastructure investment is domestic. This highlights the challenge of finding suitable domestic projects even for large funds.”
– Is bigger always better when it comes to pension funds?
Sir Steve Webb, a former Liberal Democrat pensions minister who is now a partner at consultants LCP (Lane Clark & Peacock), said: “It’s ultimately got to be about the members. Big isn’t always beautiful. There are some smaller pension schemes in Britain which are very good.
“They are heavily subsidised by employers, they offer very good pensions and it would be very unfortunate if something like that was destroyed by a crude size rule. It can’t be a crude cut-off point. It can’t be an assumption that big is always better.”
Discussing the opportunities for investment, Sir Steve told the PA news agency there is a “whole raft of things that Britain needs more money invested in”.
But he said that opportunities need to be “investable”, adding: “Some of this is about supply side and making sure there are schemes to invest in. There is a lot of work to be done in this space. There is a lot to be done on whether public money can be spent to leverage in private money.”
Sir Steve said the key benchmark needed to be: “Is this in the interests of the members?”
Another potential risk could be that megafunds end up being “pretty much the same”, he said, adding: “When there are a lot to choose from, there’s quite a bit of competition.”
He added: “Smaller schemes can still invest in big stuff … big isn’t always best.”
– Is the idea of pooling pension funds new to the UK?
Sir Steve pointed out that plans for pooling local government pension funds had previously been set out nearly a decade ago “so these so-called megafunds already exist, it’s just that they’re not big enough, they’re not mega enough”.
He added: “It’s taken a long time to get this far, it’s not a new idea, it’s evolution not revolution, and none the worse for that … it will take time.”
– How will standards be overseen?
Megafunds will need to meet rigorous standards to ensure they deliver for savers, such as needing to be authorised by the Financial Conduct Authority, the Government has said.
– What have businesses had to say?
We're announcing proposals to merge the Local Government Pension Scheme assets and defined contribution pension schemes into megafunds.
This could help to unlock around £80bn of investment for new infrastructure projects and exciting new businesses with high growth potential.
— HM Treasury (@hmtreasury) November 14, 2024
Businesses have already been highlighting cost pressures, following changes announced in the Budget, warning that jobs and pay rises will be squeezed.
A £26 billion increase in employers’ national insurance contributions announced at the Budget, comes into effect from April.
Changes to agricultural inheritance tax relief have also prompted concerns.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here