The “emerging serious concern” of a rise in baby deaths at the Countess of Chester Hospital should have been shared openly, an inspection chief has told a public inquiry over the crimes of Lucy Letby.
An inspection team from the Care Quality Commission (CQC) was not told of a spike in neonatal mortality or that a number of the deaths were unexpected and unexplained when they visited the hospital in mid-February 2016.
The killer nurse had already murdered five infants by then and during the inspection period she attempted to murder a baby girl, Child K, as she dislodged her breathing tube in the early hours of February 17.
A week before the inspection an external “thematic” review into 10 deaths on the unit in 2015 and January 2016 noted “some of the babies suddenly and unexpectedly deteriorated and there was no clear cause for the deterioration/death identified”.
It also found six babies had arrests between midnight and 4am but it concluded no common theme had been found in all the cases examined.
Medical director Ian Harvey and director of nursing Alison Kelly received copies of the review the day before the inspection after Mr Harvey requested it with reference to the CQC visit, the Thirlwall Inquiry has heard.
But inspectors from the healthcare regulator have told the inquiry that neither mentioned the review when they were interviewed on site.
Giving evidence on Friday, the then CQC regional head of hospital inspections Ann Ford said: “This was different.
“This wasn’t just information.
“This was about an emerging serious concern.
“It was a really, really significant issue and I think they should have made us aware of it immediately.
“Any documentation, any audits, any reviews, any work they had undertaken, should have been shared transparently and openly.
“I really do think the trust had a professional obligation and an obligation to patients to be open and transparent with us and I would have liked to have known about those concerns earlier.”
She said she first learned of an increase in neonatal mortality on June 29 2016 in a phone call from Ms Kelly after the inspection report had been published earlier that day and had rated services for children and young people as “good”.
Ms Kelly said a number of measures had been taken including downgrading the neonatal unit so intensive care babies were taken to other centres but Letby was not mentioned, said Ms Ford.
Ms Ford told the hearing: “I think we should have been alerted about the concerns of a practitioner on the unit and how they were managing that.”
The inspection chief also said that concerns had been raised by consultants during the inspection that they were being “oppressed” and “bullied” by senior management.
She said the comments were made during a focus group meeting and also included concerns about staffing levels and the trust not listening to them.
Ms Ford said she thought the feedback was later brought up by inspectors with Mr Harvey.
She said: “I understand his reaction was that they were working on culture in the trust and that he would speak to the consultant body and he would begin to address those concerns.”
Letby, 34, from Hereford, is serving 15 whole-life orders after she was convicted at Manchester Crown Court of murdering seven infants and attempting to murder seven others, with two attempts on one of her victims, between June 2015 and June 2016.
The inquiry, sitting at Liverpool Town Hall, is expected to sit until early 2025, with findings published by late autumn of that year.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here