Following Wednesday’s Prime Minister’s Questions (PMQs), a social media user posted: “Kemi Badenoch at #PMQs complaining about 4-day week. She thinks staff get an extra day off – less hours for same pay! She fails to realise that 40hrs over 4 days is still 40hrs!”
Evaluation
South Cambridgeshire District Council first trialled a four-day working week for some staff in January 2023, which has seen workers get 100% pay but only work around 80% of their hours.
On November 8, a few days before Mrs Badenoch’s comment during PMQs, the council was sent a letter from the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government to say a letter it had previously sent with concerns about the four-day week scheme had expired and would not be reissued.
On the same day, the Government withdrew guidance that said it does “not support a 4-day working week in local authorities”.
The facts
During PMQs, Mrs Badenoch asked Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer: “Does he think it appropriate to approve – as the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government has done – a four-day week for councils? That is not flexible working but part-time work for full-time pay.”
South Cambridgeshire District Council started trialling a four-day work week in January 2023 for some staff, saying the model would mean people “deliver 100% of their work, in around 80% of their hours (or pro rata for part time colleagues), for 100% of their pay”. It was initially meant to last for three months, but was then extended for a further 12 months to March 2024.
Since the trial began, the Department for Levelling Up, Housing and Communities – later renamed the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government – has sent the council two Best Value Notices in November 2023 and May 2024 after it continued with the four-day working week arrangement. The Conservative government had asked councils to stop four-day week trials. Best Value Notices express the government’s potential concerns with an authority and set expectations of what needs to be done.
On November 8, the now Labour-led ministry wrote to the council to say that the Best Value Notice had expired and would not be reissued, which was a few days before Mrs Badenoch’s comment was made during PMQs. On the same day, the ministry also withdrew previous guidance which stated that the “government does not support a 4-day working week in local authorities”.
In addition, one of the items on the agenda for a Cambridge City Council Strategy and Resources Scrutiny Committee meeting on March 25 2024 was an update on the four-day week trial. The leader of the council agreed the hours for South Cambridgeshire District Council colleagues working a four-day week (desk-based and waste operations), “are harmonised at 32 hours per week (pro rata for part time colleagues) at 86.5% of contracted hours” from April 1.
Although South Cambridgeshire District Council adopted a four-day week which sees people work roughly 80% of their hours for 100% of their pay, some workplaces have four-day week arrangements where employees may work the same total hours they would in a five-day week but squeezed into four days. The social media user mentioned they have this type of work arrangement.
Links
Engagements from Nov 13 – Hansard (archived)
Details of four-day working week – South Cambridgeshire District Council (archived)
Best Value Notice definition (archived)
Press release on Best Value Notice expiring (archived)
Government press release on councils running four-day weeks (archived)
Gov.uk – (Withdrawn) Four-day working week arrangements in local authorities (archived)
Cambridge City Council’s Strategy and Resources Scrutiny Committee meeting – March 25 (archived)
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here