Sir Keir Starmer has again defended changes to inheritance tax for farms, insisting that most will be unaffected and that the Government just needs to “keep explaining” how it will work.
A row has erupted over the taxes for farms worth more than £1 million, exacerbated by uncertainty about the figures Chancellor Rachel Reeves based the decision on.
Treasury data shows that around three quarters of farmers will pay nothing in inheritance tax as a result of the controversial changes announced in the Budget last month.
But farmers have challenged the figures, pointing instead to data from Defra which suggests 66% of farm businesses are worth more than the £1 million threshold at which inheritance tax will now have to be paid.
The Prime Minister said during a visit to North Wales on Friday: “I know some farmers are anxious about the inheritance tax rules that we brought in two weeks ago.
“What I would say about that is, once you add the £1 million for the farm land to the £1 million that is exempt for your spouse, for most couples with a farm wanting to hand on to their children, it’s £3 million before anybody pays a penny in inheritance tax.
“And that is why the vast majority of farms are going to be totally unaffected by this. And it’s really important we get that through.”
He added: “So we just need to keep explaining how that works, because I know it’s caused some anxiety.”
The inheritance tax changes for farming businesses in the Budget limit the 100% relief for farms to only the first £1 million of combined agricultural and business property.
For anything above that, landowners will pay a 20% tax rate, rather than the standard 40% rate of inheritance tax (IHT) applied to other land and property.
On Saturday, farmers in North Wales will gather on tractors for a protest against the changes in Llandudno to coincide with the Welsh Labour Conference.
The National Farmers’ Union (NFU) is holding a mass lobby of MPs on Tuesday as part of efforts to force a Government rethink and a separate rally is taking place on the same day on Whitehall, opposite Downing Street.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here