Former MP William Wragg has described the feeling of “enormous guilt” that washed over him as he realised he had fallen victim to a sophisticated scam designed to target politicians in Westminster.
A police probe began in April earlier this year after it was suggested at least 12 men with links to Westminster had received unsolicited messages from the aliases “Charlie” and “Abi”.
The fake accounts were allegedly engaged in a sophisticated scam designed to coax MPs and other figures in political circles into sending explicit pictures and other private or sensitive information.
Unlike others who had been approached by the catfish accounts, 36-year-old now-ex-MP William Wragg approached “Charlie” himself after spotting the profile on gay dating app Grindr.
He believed the account to be a real person before exchanging explicit photographs with the catfish.
In the days that followed, Mr Wragg claimed he felt threatened and pressured into sharing’ the phone numbers and personal information of his Westminster colleagues to the mystery account.
He feared the catfish would leak his intimate images in retaliation if he did not comply.
Speaking to the BBC in his first broadcast interview about his involvement, Mr Wragg said he spotted the first news articles about the Westminster honeytrap scandal on the train.
The former Conservative Party whip told the broadcaster: “My stomach just dropped.
“When I found out some of the things that had been going on, I just felt enormous guilt, enormous remorse.”
After the former Hazel Grove MP handed over the personal information, the catfish told Mr Wragg to vouch for its identity with its next potential victims, with the catfish telling its fresh targets he was a former researcher for Mr Wragg.
Mr Wragg agreed, which is what he feels “the most regret for” as it was “deceitful”.
Not long after he was allegedly blackmailed, Mr Wragg began to have panic attacks, with bouts of yelling, crying, and swearing shocking his sleeping flatmates.
He told the BBC that while his housemates were worried, he could not explain to them what was going on.
Then, when the story broke, the humiliation and shame became too much for him to handle.
He recounted photographers and the press camped outside his parents’ house, which is where he drove as suicidal thoughts began to set in.
Shortly after receiving the appropriate medical attention, he returned to Westminster to resign as Conservative whip and from his posts on two parliamentary committees.
He had already announced he would not run in the next general election.
Asked by BBC reporter Joe Pike how he feels, seven months on from the scandal that ended his career in politics, Mr Wragg said: “I have no bitterness or anger left in me because I felt so wretched and awful in myself.”
He added: “It’s a source of great shame that my time in Parliament ended in this way.”
On his final day as an MP, he said he had a consult with a psychologist, which he thought to be a fitting end for his nine-year tenure at Commons.
He then added a grim truth about the pressures of life within the walls of Westminster: “They have two mental health beds available at any one time for members of Parliament,” he said.
“It’s surprising how often they’re occupied.”
In June, a member of the Labour Party aged in his mid-20s was apprehended in Islington, north London, on suspicion of harassment and offences under the Online Safety Act.
He has since been released on bail.
– If you or someone you know is struggling with their mental health, the Samaritans can be contacted on 116 123 or email jo@samaritans.org.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel