A US animal shelter is dealing with a great big problem after a man arrived to hand over what he initially said was 150 mice.
However, the donor to the shelter in the state of New Hampshire later clarified that he had 150 containers of mice, not individual creatures.
He eventually turned over around 1,000 of the rodents to the facility in Stratham.
The shelter’s executive director said that before this event, the most creatures it had ever taken on a single day was 125 animals.
Lisa Dennison, executive director of the New Hampshire Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals, said basic biology is making things worse. Mice breed early and often, and many of the rodents arrived at the shelter pregnant – and the effect on the facility is “crippling”.
Lined up nose to tail, the mice would span more than a football pitch. There are enough to give one mouse to every member of the US Congress and the 424-member New Hampshire state legislature combined.
“Even in the short time that we’ve had them, many of these mice have given birth,” Ms Dennison said. “It’s an exponential problem that keeps growing.”
Part of the shelter’s cat pavilion has been turned into a mouse hospital and hotel, with dozens of containers lined up on the floor, resting on top of multiple tables and stacked on shelves.
Just logging each mouse into the shelter’s database is a chore, never mind providing food, water and bedding.
Ms Dennison said of the logistics: “It does happen where you take a large number, but even when we took in 54 goats or we took in 39 cats, I mean, those are still large numbers, but much more manageable as you can imagine than hundreds and hundreds of mice.”
Other shelters have agreed to take some of the mice, and some are being sent to foster homes as the shelter seeks donations of food supplies. About a dozen mice were ready for adoption on Friday after being named by shelter staff and volunteers.
Doug, Darrell, Dude and Deputy were waiting for homes in one tank. Others were given sweet-inspired names — Butterfinger, Junior Mint and Milk Dud, to name a few.
Elisha Murray heard about the shelter’s predicament from local news and decided to adopt four females named Kelly, Dee, Maxine and Eleven, despite having told her children last week: “No more rodents.”
“We’ve always had small rodents as pets – rats, mice, hamsters – so I just figured I could help out,” she said.
“We have the whole set-up, everything I need at home already – so I figured, what the hell?”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel