“Men wearing wigs and using brown make-up” are depriving black women and members of other ethnic groups of top stunt roles in movies, according to a new study.
Dr Laura Crossley, a researcher at Bournemouth University, has found that despite an increase in female action roles in the movies, women still struggle to get into core stunt teams
She said: “It is very difficult for stunt women to become part of regular crews.
“Because the industry has been male dominated so long, most stunt co-ordinators on film sets are men.
“As a result, you can end up with male co-ordinators hiring other men and putting them in drag to perform stunts, or even using men wearing brown make-up and wigs to double for women of colour.”
The study, published in the Journal of British Cinema and Television, highlights that an increase in action heroines from different ethnic groups on screen has led to greater demand for female stunt doubles from those backgrounds.
Dr Crossley said that performers like Marie Mouroum and Belle Williams, who have carried out stunts in the Bond franchise as MI6 agent Nomi and Eve Moneypenny respectively, “represent positive steps but they are exceptions rather than the rule”.
Dr Crossley also said that because the work of stunt people is “invisible” to the public, there is limited scrutiny of representation compared with acting and directing roles.
She said this is worsened by the industry pushing the idea that actors perform their own stunts.
She said the lack of female roles dates back to when Hollywood moved to the studio system, and women were “frozen out”.
For the study, Dr Crossley spoke to stunt directors Annie Lees-Jones and Tiger Lilli Rudge.
She said: “One of the things Tiger suggested was that when a male stunt co-ordinator is appointed, the producers should hire a woman alongside him, training her so that she gets more experience.
“At the moment the co-ordinators tend to hire performers who they have worked with in the past, and they are usually men.
“Change will only come about if women are given more opportunities. For an industry that makes a lot of noise about representation and diversity, the reality is that a lot more needs to be done.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel