A bird species found in mainland Europe and the Mediterranean is thought to be extinct globally by a coalition of conservation groups.
The slender-billed curlew – a migratory shorebird that bred in western Siberia and migrated to the Mediterranean in winter – could be the first known global bird extinction from mainland Europe, north Africa and west Asia.
Scientists from the RSPB, BirdLife International, Naturalis Biodiversity Centre in the Netherlands and Natural History Museum published an analysis of the species conservation status on Monday.
They found that the last irrefutable sighting of the slender-billed curlew was in February 1995 in Morocco and are concluding it is globally extinct.
The International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) red list, which officially rules species as extinct, has not done so yet for the slender-billed curlew.
The conservation groups said extensive efforts that have been made for decades to find evidence of the bird across its breeding and non-breeding ranges have all proved unsuccessful.
It marks a stark warning of the need to tackle the loss and degradation of inland grassland and wetland, they said.
The paper, published in the journal IBIS, used objective statistical analysis of threats to the species and a database of records, including museum specimens and sightings, to assess the likelihood of extinction.
Their findings suggest there is a 99.6% chance that the bird no longer exists and went extinct around the time of the last record two decades ago.
Nicola Crockford, principal policy officer for the RSPB, said: “This is one of the most fundamentally devastating stories to come out of nature conservation in a century and gets to the very heart of why the RSPB and BirdLife Partnership are doing what we do; that is, ultimately, to prevent extinction of species.”
Commenting on the bird’s connection to Europe and the Mediterranean, she said: “How can we expect countries beyond Europe to step up for their species when our comparatively wealthy countries have failed?
“Extinction is forever. This news highlights that our work to save the Eurasian curlew and black-tailed godwit, as well as many other migratory shorebirds that are of conservation concern, is of utmost urgency to prevent more species following the slender-billed curlew into extinction.”
Graeme Buchanan, head of international conservation science with the RSPB, said: “Declaring a species extinct is not something that is done lightly and the IUCN who make the ultimate decision on extinction for the red list of threatened species need full details of the status of a species before doing so.”
He said that while declaring a species extinct too soon could lead to the removal of potentially beneficial conservation efforts, prolonged investment in already extinct species could waste limited resources.
“It is now up to IUCN to make the decision on the status of the species,” he said.
The conservationists said the causes of the slender-billed curlew’s decline may never be fully understood, but possible pressures included extensive drainage of their raised bog breeding grounds for agricultural use, the loss of coastal wetlands used for winter feeding, and hunting, especially latterly, of an already reduced, fragmented and declining population.
There also could have been impacts from pollution, disease, predation and climate change, but the scale of these impacts is unknown, they added.
Dr Alex Bond, senior curator in charge of birds at the Natural History Museum, has been part of the team tracing the fate of the curlew and said the extinction of bird species is “going to be the status quo” as climate change continues.
“Things are not getting better for birds,” he said. “Tackling climate change, habitat destruction and pollution is the best chance we’ve got at protecting them, at home and abroad.”
PA has contacted the IUCN for comment.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here