Australian senators have voted to censure an Indigenous colleague who yelled at the King during a reception in Parliament House.
The censure of independent Senator Lidia Thorpe is a symbolic gesture that records her colleagues’ disapproval of her conduct during October’s first visit to Australia by a British monarch in 13 years.
The motion was carried 46 votes to 12.
Government leader in the Senate Penny Wong said Ms Thorpe’s outburst sought to “incite outrage and grievance.”
“This is part of a trend that we do see internationally which, quite frankly, we do not need here in Australia,” Ms Wong told the Senate.
Ms Thorpe launched the rant at Charles following his speech during his visit to Canberra.
“You are not our king. You are not sovereign,” she yelled as she was led by security guards from the reception.
“You committed genocide against our people. Give us our land back. Give us what you stole from us: our bones, our skulls, our babies, our people.”
Following her censure, she said she would repeat her rant if Charles returned.
“If the colonising king were to come to my country again, our country, then I’ll do it again,” she told reporters.
“And I will keep doing it. I will resist colonisation in this country. I swear my allegiance to the real sovereigns of these lands; First Peoples are the real sovereigns. You don’t have some random king rock up and say he’s sovereign.”
Senator Mehreen Faruqi, a member of the minor Greens party, opposed the censure motion.
“The bubble of white privilege that encapsulates this parliament is a systemic issue,” she said.
“That’s why we are here today, debating a black senator being censured for telling the truth of the British crown’s genocide of First Nations people and telling it the way she wants to.”
The vote took place before Ms Thorpe arrived on a flight from Melbourne. She said she had wanted to be in Parliament for the vote but government senators refused to wait.
Indigenous people account for fewer than 4% of Australia’s population and are the nation’s most disadvantaged ethnic group.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here