Stormont’s former health minister Robin Swann has admitted he did not provide sufficient direction in preparing for a surge in the number of critical cases during the early months of the Covid pandemic.
Giving evidence to the UK Covid-19 Inquiry, Mr Swann said that the coming threat from the pandemic became “real” to him and Executive colleagues after modelling figures in 2020 estimated Northern Ireland could be facing 4,000 hospital admissions a day.
Module three of the inquiry is looking at the governmental and societal response to Covid-19 by assessing the impact of the pandemic on how health services were delivered.
Giving evidence on Monday morning, Mr Swann was asked about the preparedness of Northern Ireland in the early months of the pandemic in 2020.
The Stormont powersharing Executive had recently been restored at the time and Ulster Unionist Mr Swann had taken on the role as health minister.
Counsel to the inquiry, Nick Scott showed Mr Swann the first Northern Ireland specific modelling for Covid, which was produced on March 20 2020.
The modelling indicated that without intervention, Northern Ireland could have been facing 32,000 cases a day with 4,000 daily hospitalisations.
Mr Scott asked: “Did this present a dramatic change in terms of the numbers that would have to be dealt with?”
Mr Swann said: “At that specific point in regard to the 32,000 daily new symptomatic cases (it) was a stark focus in regards to what Northern Ireland was actually going to be facing in regards to those numbers without any intervention.”
Mr Scott said: “Did it present a step change to what you were working towards?”
Mr Swann said: “I think it was at that point, in regard to the 32,000, the daily hospital admissions of 4,000 possibly per day, was really that point that made this whole thing real both to me and my Executive colleagues.”
Mr Scott said: “This is the 9th March, did it not feel real well before that point in terms of what was likely to happen in Northern Ireland?”
Mr Swann said: “It did feel real, but I think when you see a population of 1.9 million in Northern Ireland, where we could be facing 32,000 cases per day, 4,000 hospital admissions without behavioural intervention, that was the crux that made it real for us.”
The barrister asked if prior to the modelling there had been “sufficient pace of planning to ensure the health service could respond to the pandemic”.
Mr Swann said: “I don’t think that the surge plans in their totality were preparing for the numbers we were potentially going to see without the daily interventions.
“The average daily beds available in Northern Ireland were actually less than what was being expected as the Covid peak daily new hospital admissions. It would have crippled our system completely if we hadn’t taken those behavioural interventions that we did.”
Mr Scott said that 10 days after the modelling figures, the department of health published a summary plan to ensure there was sufficient capacity to meet increase in demand.
He asked the former minister why it did not include a surge plan for critical care cases.
Mr Swann said: “There was not one developed at that stage that I am aware of.”
Mr Scott said: “Did you look at this and say how are we going to scale that critical care? Do we have a plan in place?”
Mr Swann replied: “If that is not in that submission then I didn’t.”
Mr Scott said: “Do you think that is a question you should have asked?”
Mr Swann said: “On reflection, yes. I was newly into the position… what I know now is very different from what I knew then.”
The barrister said: “It is not a matter of how long you were in the role to assess whether there was a plan in place for you were going to scale up critical care.”
Mr Swann said: “It is that ability to be able to ask the right question at the right time. With hindsight, knowing what I know now, I would have asked that, I would have insisted on it.”
Mr Scott asked: “Do you think then, that whatever the reason, you weren’t providing a sufficient level of direction as the health minister, that you believed you probably should have provided?”
Mr Swann responded: “Yes.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here