Forty-five ex-politicians and activists have been sentenced to four to 10 years in prison in Hong Kong’s biggest national security case under a Beijing-imposed law that crushed a once-thriving pro-democracy movement.
They were prosecuted under the 2020 national security law for their roles in an unofficial primary election.
Prosecutors said their aim was to paralyse Hong Kong’s government and force the city’s leader to resign by aiming to win a legislative majority and using it to block government budgets indiscriminately.
The unofficial primary held in July 2020 drew 610,000 voters, and its winners had been expected to advance to the official election.
But authorities cancelled the official legislative election, citing public health risks during the Covid-19 pandemic.
Legal scholar Benny Tai, whom the judges called the mastermind, received the longest sentence of 10 years. The judges said the sentences had been reduced for defendants who said they were unaware the plan was unlawful.
But the court said the penalties were not reduced for Tai and former politician Alvin Yeung because they were lawyers who were “absolutely adamant in pushing for the implementation of the scheme”.
In the judgment posted online, the judges wrote that Tai essentially “advocated for a revolution” by publishing a series of articles over a period of months that traced his thinking, even though in a letter seeking a shorter sentence Tai said the steps were “never intended to be used as blueprint for any political action”.
Two of the 47 original defendants were acquitted earlier this year. The rest either pleaded guilty or were found guilty of conspiracy to commit subversion.
The judges said in their verdict that the activists’ plans to effect change through the unofficial primary would have undermined the government’s authority and created a constitutional crisis.
The judges rejected the reasoning from some defendants that the scheme would never have materialised, stating that “all the participants had put in every endeavour to make it a success”.
The judges highlighted that a great deal of time, resources and money were devoted to the organisation of the primary election.
“When the primary election took place on July 10 and 11, no-one had remotely mentioned the fact that primary election was no more than an academic exercise and that the scheme was absolutely unattainable,” the judgment read.
“In order to succeed, the organisers and participants might have hurdles to overcome, that however was expected in every subversion case where efforts were made to overthrow or paralyse a government.”
Some of the defendants waved at their relatives in the courtroom after they were sentenced.
Gwyneth Ho, a journalist-turned-activist who was jailed for seven years, wrote on her Facebook page: “Our true crime for Beijing is that we were not content with playing along in manipulated elections.”
“We dared to confront the regime with the question: Will democracy ever be possible within such a structure? The answer was a complete crackdown on all fronts of society,” she wrote.
Observers said the trial illustrated how authorities suppressed dissent following huge anti-government protests in 2019, alongside media crackdowns and reduced public choice in elections.
The drastic changes reflected how Beijing’s promise to retain the former British colony’s civil liberties for 50 years when it returned to China in 1997 was increasingly threadbare, they said.
Beijing and Hong Kong governments insisted the national security law was necessary for the city’s stability.
The sentencing drew criticism from foreign governments and human rights organisations.
Hong Kong’s last British governor Chris Patten said in a statement that the sentencing was “not only an affront to the people of Hong Kong, but those who value rights and freedoms around the world”.
He condemned the “sham” sentences, calling on the British government not to allow the results of the case to go unnoticed. He said the activists were an integral part of the city’s pro-democracy movement.
Meanwhile, the US Consulate in Hong Kong said America strongly condemned the sentences.
“The defendants were aggressively prosecuted and jailed for peacefully participating in normal political activity protected under Hong Kong’s Basic Law,” the statement said, referring to the city’s mini-constitution.
Hong Kong secretary for security Chris Tang said in a news briefing that the sentences showed those committing national security crimes must be severely punished.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel