The UK’s commitment to Ukraine remains “ironclad”, Sir Keir Starmer said as Vladimir Putin ratcheted up nuclear tensions on the 1,000th day of the conflict.
The Prime Minister said it was a “sobering milestone” amid continued speculation he could give Kyiv permission to use UK-supplied Storm Shadow missiles to hit targets deep inside Russian territory.
The Kremlin marked the anniversary of the invasion by lowering the threshold at which Russian forces could use nuclear weapons.
Mr Putin signed a revised nuclear doctrine declaring that a conventional attack on Russia by any nation that is supported by a nuclear power will be considered a joint attack on his country.
Today is the sobering milestone of 1,000 days since Putin’s illegal invasion of Ukraine.
As the people of Ukraine continue to bravely defend their sovereignty, the UK’s commitment to them remains ironclad.
— Keir Starmer (@Keir_Starmer) November 19, 2024
It means that any massive aerial attack on Russia could potentially trigger a nuclear response.
The move comes after US President Joe Biden authorised the use of American-supplied missiles by Ukraine to hit targets in Russian territory, a move Sir Keir could follow.
The Prime Minister said: “Today is the sobering milestone of 1,000 days since Putin’s illegal invasion of Ukraine.
“As the people of Ukraine continue to bravely defend their sovereignty, the UK’s commitment to them remains ironclad.”
Defence Secretary John Healey visited a Ukrainian Catholic church in London with Tory shadow James Cartlidge to demonstrate cross-party support for Kyiv’s cause.
The UK will provide £7.5 million for new attack and surveillance drones, the Ministry of Defence said on Tuesday.
Mr Healey said: “The UK has stood side by side with our Ukrainian allies since day one of Putin’s illegal, full-scale invasion – leading international support, training 50,000 recruits and supplying weapons, drones and other crucial military kit.”
Meanwhile, UK sanctions against 10 entities and individuals accused of the “forcible deportation and attempted indoctrination” of Ukrainian children were announced by the Foreign Office on Tuesday.
Those targeted in the latest wave of measures include:
– All-Russian Young Army Military Patriotic Social Movement (Yunarmia), a Russian paramilitary organisation.
– Tetiana Zavalska, the Russian-appointed head of Kherson Children’s Home, where the Foreign Office said 46 children were forcibly taken to Russia for adoption.
– Vitaliy Aleksandrovich Suk, director of the Oleshki Boarding School for children with disabilities in Kherson, who is accused of using his position to illegally transfer disabled Ukrainian children out of Kherson.
Others sanctioned are Nikita Vladimirovich Nagorny, Igor Kazarezov, Andrey Sabinov, Avangard, Serafim Vikentevich Ivanov, Olena Oleksandrivna Shapurova, and Valentina Vasilyevna Lavrik.
Foreign Secretary David Lammy said: “No child should ever be used as a pawn in war, yet President Putin’s targeting of Ukrainian children shows the depths he will go to in his mission to erase Ukraine and its people from the map.
“As Ukraine reaches the grim milestone of 1,000 days of bravely defending against Putin’s illegal invasion, the UK’s support is iron-clad. With our international partners, we stand with Ukraine to confront Russian aggression and fight for freedom, liberty and victory.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel