Police must investigate so-called non-crime hate incidents so they do not miss “precursors to violence”, one of the UK’s most senior officers has said.
Chairman of the National Police Chiefs’ Council (NPCC) Gavin Stephens said the rioting over the summer showed that online hate can cause “real damage” in communities if left unchecked.
Speaking to journalists at a major policing conference in Westminster, he said: “Hate left unaddressed, whether that’s propagated online or in person, has real-world consequences.
“And we saw that at its most severe this summer where, left unchecked, hate can have real damage on communities.”
The debate has been renewed over whether police are misapplying guidance around non-crime hate incidents (NCHIs), after Telegraph columnist Allison Pearson was visited by officers from Essex Police over a year-old tweet.
The force has since said officers visited the journalist to set up an interview over an allegation of potential incitement to racial hatred. There is no suggestion of any link to violence.
In September, watchdog His Majesty’s Inspectorate of Constabulary and Fire and Rescue Services found that police are recording and attending too many NCHIs, and not consistently applying national guidance.
Speaking at the same conference, Home Secretary Yvette Cooper said officers should adopt “a common sense and consistent approach” to dealing with these issues.
Mr Stephens said: “There is a very legitimate debate and in a way I would describe it as the same debate that we had a few decades ago about what is the role of the state in the family.
“And of course, there didn’t used to be a role for the state in the family but we’ve learned through child abuse scandals over the decades, where we are with domestic abuse, that we need to take a stand on these things.
“And I think we’re right in the middle of that debate in relation to hate and the role of the state.
“The role of policing is to investigate crime and, if an allegation of crime is made, it needs to be properly investigated, and the process needs to take its course.
“And from a policing perspective, one of the things that we’re really, really clear on is that we do not want to miss precursors to violence because we know that if we miss those precursors to violence the consequences can be severe.
“So it’s very important that we have this debate about where the thresholds are, what the law says.
“Of course, if Parliament want a different law, they can change it, but it’s really important that we investigate allegations of crime that are made, that we don’t miss precursors to violence and that we play our role in trying to stem the tide of hatred.”
Chairwoman of the Association of Police and Crime Commissioners Emily Spurrell said the public would expect police to investigate allegations of hate crime.
“When you look at hate crime across the country, it’s actually under-reported,” she said.
“We know that there are lots of hate crimes happening that actually people don’t necessarily have the confidence to report yet because they’re not always sure that they’re going to get the right response.
“So from my perspective, as a representative public I would expect the police to investigate every report of hate crime, and obviously they will make that judgment, if it meets the threshold of being a crime then the appropriate process will be followed.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article