Google’s partnership with AI firm Anthropic will not face further investigation by the UK’s competition regulator, it has been confirmed.
The Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) said its provisional examination of the link-up between the firms had found that it does not qualify for investigation under the merger provisions of UK competition law.
The CMA has previously raised concerns it had around large tech firms investing heavily in emerging AI companies and entering into AI-based partnerships with them, warning the process was a way for the biggest companies to consolidate power and resources within the growing AI sector.
Earlier this year, the regulator highlighted more than 90 partnerships and strategic investments between a handful of the same tech giants and AI start-ups in what it called an “interconnected web” – and has since launched investigations into a number of these deals, including those involving Apple, Google, Microsoft, Amazon, and ChatGPT maker OpenAI.
On its examination of Google and Anthropic, the maker of generative AI chatbot Claude, the CMA said it had found that Google had not acquired the ability to materially influence Anthropic’s commercial policy and therefore the partnership did not meet the threshold for UK merger control to apply.
The watchdog said its so-called turnover test was not met either, as Anthropic UK’s turnover does not exceed £70 million.
Joel Bamford, the CMA’s executive director of mergers, said: “This is another decision by the CMA which provides greater clarity for businesses and their investors.
“We know fair, open and effective competition unlocks opportunities for investment and supports innovation in important markets like these, and it’s through merger reviews that we can appropriately assess the nature and impact of complex partnerships such as the one between Google and Anthropic.”
An Anthropic spokesperson said: “We welcome the CMA’s decision to conclude their review of Google’s investment in us, as a result of their conclusion that Google does not have material influence over Anthropic.
“As we’ve made clear, Anthropic is an independent company and our strategic partnerships and investor relationships do not diminish our corporate governance independence or our freedom to partner with others.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here