Sir Keir Starmer has defended his trip to Brazil amid domestic concerns as he insisted there was a “direct link between the work I do internationally and the impact back at home”.
The Prime Minister told Good Morning Britain that it is “very important” to hold discussions that could “trigger” money into the economy, having spent the last two days at the G20 summit in Rio de Janeiro.
It comes amid concerns about the impact of Budget measures on jobs and farms, and changes to the winter fuel payment.
Asked about people who do not feel able to put their heating on, Sir Keir said: “There’s a direct link between the work I do internationally and the impact back at home.
“You rightly say the central focus of what I am doing here at the G20 is on our economy, on investment into our country.
“It’s very important to have those discussions because that’s the way we trigger the money coming into our economy, to ensure that we’ve got better living standards, people feel better off and, crucially important, we’ve got jobs around the country.”
He also defended money to support Ukraine, as he said that rising energy bills are “a very important domestic reason for being absolutely clear on Ukraine”.
He added: “It is impacting people back at home, and I really get that, people have really struggled with their energy bills over the last three years. I am determined that we will do what we can to bring that down.”
Government estimates released on Tuesday indicated that the squeeze on winter fuel payments will force 100,000 pensioners into poverty in 2026.
Work and Pensions Secretary Liz Kendall revealed the Government’s assessment of the impact in a letter to MPs, but stressed the figures did not take into account plans to increase the numbers on pension credit.
She told the Work and Pensions Committee: “The latest modelling shows that compared to the numbers that would have been in poverty without this policy, it is estimated that in each year in question there will be an additional 50,000 pensioners in relative poverty after housing costs in 2024-25, 2025-26 and 2027-28, instead.
“The modelling also shows that an additional 100,000 pensioners are estimated to be in relative poverty after housing costs in 2026-27, 2028-29 and 2029-30.”
On the same day, governor of the Bank of England Andrew Bailey said retailers were “right” to warn of potential job cuts following the Budget changes.
More than 70 businesses – including Tesco, Asda and Sainsbury’s – have told Rachel Reeves in an open letter that the changes announced in last month’s Budget mean price hikes are a “certainty”.
The letter, arranged by the British Retail Consortium, was also signed by household names including Amazon, Aldi, Boots, B&Q, Currys, Greggs, JD Sports, Marks & Spencer, Next and Primark.
It said: “We appreciate Government’s focus on improving the fiscal situation and investing in public services; we also recognise the role businesses have in supporting this.
“But the sheer scale of new costs and the speed with which they occur create a cumulative burden that will make job losses inevitable, and higher prices a certainty.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel