Housebuilder Crest Nicholson is to focus less on building low-margin homes, like affordable housing, as it seeks to combat a slump in profits.
The housebuilder said it is trying to “trade out” of lower margin sites, after warning on earnings because a high proportion of the homes it built this year were classed as affordable.
Chief executive Martyn Clark promised “a year of transition” for the company, adding: “We will focus more on private sales and prioritise value over volume to enhance returns and margins.”
Crest Nicholson forecast that annual profit for its most recent financial year, which ended in October, will be at the lower end of previous forecasts.
Economists have long warned that Britain has a lack of affordable housing, partly caused by the fact cheaper homes are less lucrative for builders.
Labour has said it wants to build 1.5 million new homes in five years, a target which real estate group Savills recently warned it would miss without more grant funding for affordable homes.
Crest Nicholson said it built 1,873 homes this year and that about 45% of them were classed as affordable or designed for private renters, less than the Government’s target of half.
The figure is down on the 2,020 homes it built the year before, with Crest citing “affordability concerns” hitting private open market sales.
Mr Clark took the reins in June, during a period in which rival Bellway was trying to buy it, with the company turning down a series of takeover bids.
He suggested on Wednesday that recent cuts to interest rates by the Bank of England had made the economic outlook for Crest “more favourable”.
The Government’s attempts to bring in reforms to the planning system to enable more building had also helped the broader landscape, he said.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here