Australia’s communications minister has said the government will not force social media users to hand over their personal information to tech companies, as children younger than 16 are set to be banned from the platforms.
Michelle Rowland plans to introduce into Parliament world-first legislation that would make X, TikTok, Facebook and Instagram responsible for excluding Australian children younger than 16 from the platforms.
After the bill becomes law, the platforms would have one year to work out how to implement the ban on younger children before they face fines of up to 50 million Australian dollars (£25.7 million) for systemic breaches.
How the platforms will be able to determine the ages of account holders is not yet known.
Ms Rowland told the Australian Parliament on Wednesday the legislation will contain “robust provisions” to protect social media users’ privacy.
“This is not about government mandating any form of technology or demanding any personal information be handed over to social media companies,” she said.
The government announced last week that a consortium led by British company Age Check Certification Scheme has been contracted to examine various technologies to estimate and verify ages.
In addition to removing children under 16 from social media, Australia is also looking for ways to prevent children under 18 from accessing online pornography, a government statement said.
Age Check Certification Scheme’s chief executive Tony Allen said on Monday the technologies being considered included age estimation and age inference.
Inference involves establishing a series of facts about individuals that point to them being at least a certain age.
“None of these methods is 100% accurate,” Mr Allen told the Australian Broadcasting Corp.
Mr Allen’s company will report back to the Australian government by the end of June next year.
He said: “I think if people understand the risk and the check is carried out close to that risk, then I think people generally are OK … We don’t want our children to be exposed to extreme violent video games or to pornography or to suicide material or to things that are going to cause them problems with their mental development such as body dysmorphia and weight loss and stuff like that.
“What people are less keen on is having to go through ID check and verifications to access the internet generally or to do things online generally.
Digital Industry Group, an advocate for the digital industry in Australia, described the age limit as a “20th century response to 21st century challenges”.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here