Former health secretary Matt Hancock is to give evidence at the official Covid-19 inquiry.
He will face a number of questions about his work before the pandemic and the government’s response to the crisis.
Mr Hancock served as health secretary from 9 July 2018 to 26 June 2021 and played a key role in the government’s initial response as the pandemic unfolded.
He became a household name during the crisis and regularly appeared in Downing Street press briefings.
He resigned from his post the day after video footage emerged of him kissing his former aide Gina Coladangelo in his ministerial office during a time of coronavirus social-distancing restrictions.
After his dramatic exit from the front bench, Mr Hancock made the headlines once again when he signed on to feature in the popular ITV reality show I’m A Celebrity… Get Me Out of Here!
The ex-minister’s evidence is expected to take up the whole of Thursday’s sitting hours and will run into Friday morning.
It will be the third time Mr Hancock has given evidence to the UK Covid-19 Public Inquiry in person.
The official inquiry is currently examining the impact of the pandemic on healthcare across the UK.
It will look into the government and societal response to Covid-19, as well as examining the impact the pandemic had on healthcare systems, patients and healthcare workers.
Mr Hancock’s evidence comes as new analysis by the TaxPayers’ Alliance suggests that the inquiry is projected to cost almost £208 million.
The organisation said that this would make it the most expensive statutory inquiry.
Commenting ahead of Mr Hancock’s appearance, Kate Bell, assistant general secretary of the TUC, said: “NHS staff put their lives on the line to get us through the pandemic.
“The very least they deserve from Matt Hancock is honesty and accountability.
“The former health secretary must come clean about the readiness and resilience of our health service when Covid struck.
“This inquiry has heard widespread evidence about how compromised the NHS was following years of underfunding.
“Mr Hancock must explain the political decisions he and other ministers took before and during the virus.”
Professor Philip Banfield, chair of council at the British Medical Association, added: “Mr Hancock needs to ditch soundbites and be transparent with the public. He owes this both to the public and to health professionals.
“Only by being honest about the past can we hope to make real changes for the future.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel