The United States Government has proposed forcing Google to sell off its Chrome web browser as part of measures to break up a monopoly a judge has said the company currently operates in online searches.
According to court papers filed by the US Department of Justice (DoJ), the proposals call for Google to sell its industry-leading Chrome web browser, and impose restrictions designed to prevent its Android smartphones software from favouring Google’s own search engine.
The proposals also call for Google to be banned from signing multibillion-pound deals with smartphone makers such as Apple to make Google Search the default search engine on those companies’ devices, including the iPhone, and to force Google to share data it collects from its search engine with its rivals in an effort to boost competition in the sector.
In its recommendations, the DoJ said: “The playing field is not level because of Google’s conduct, and Google’s quality reflects the ill-gotten gains of an advantage illegally acquired.
“The remedy must close this gap and deprive Google of these advantages.”
Google’s president of global affairs and chief legal officer, Kent Walker, called the proposals “staggering” and “extreme”, warning they would “break” many of Google’s products and endanger the security and privacy of US users as a result.
“(The) DOJ chose to push a radical interventionist agenda that would harm Americans and America’s global technology leadership,” he said.
“DOJ’s wildly overbroad proposal goes miles beyond the court’s decision.
“It would break a range of Google products – even beyond Search – that people love and find helpful in their everyday lives.”
The recommendations are in response to a landmark ruling in August by US district judge Amit Mehta, who branded Google as a monopolist.
Court hearings on the proposed remedies are scheduled to begin in April, with a final decision on the issue expected by next summer – although the case could be further prolonged should Judge Mehta side with the DoJ’s recommendations, with Google then almost certain to appeal.
It also remains unclear if attitudes inside the DoJ will change – and a less strident approach is sought – after President-elect Donald Trump takes office in January.
Mr Trump is widely expected to replace Jonathan Kanter, who was appointed by President Joe Biden to lead the department’s antitrust division.
Google is expected to lodge its own proposed remedies before the end of the year.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here