A teenager accused of murdering a woman has refused to appear for his first crown court hearing.
Deng Chol Majek, 18, who is charged with murdering Rhiannon Skye Whyte, 27, was due to appear at Wolverhampton Crown Court via videolink from HMP Manchester on Thursday to enter pleas, but refused to appear.
Ms Whyte died in hospital on October 23, three days after being injured at Bescot Stadium station in Walsall, West Midlands.
Chol Majek, of Bescot Crescent in Walsall, was initially charged with attempted murder and possession of an offensive weapon, but the first charge was upgraded to murder when Ms Whyte died, surrounded by her family.
Defending Chol Majek, who is from South Sudan, Charlie Crinion said the teenager had refused to speak to him through an interpreter before the hearing because he did not know who he was.
Judge Michael Chambers KC said he would proceed with the case as if the defendant would be contesting the charges.
Prosecutor Michelle Heeley KC said a trial, which could happen in April 2025, would be expected to last between five and seven days.
Addressing Mr Crinion, Judge Chambers said: “It is important that you have a proper conference and that, like any defendant, he has full confidence in his representation.
“I am not in a position to give a trial date this morning.”
A further hearing was set for December 13.
In a statement issued through police after her death, Ms Whyte’s family said: “The most loved daughter, compassionate sister, loving auntie, gracious granddaughter, beautiful niece, wonderful cousin and devoted friend.
“The most selfless person, you were brave, quirky, funny and always there for anyone who needed it. There is not enough paper in the world to even begin to write a tribute for you, but no one deserves it more.
“The weird thing about this devastating loss is that we now need to navigate life without you, but how? If your short life will teach anything, it’s to cherish each moment with those you love as tomorrow is never guaranteed.
“You are so strong, a fighter and no matter what happens, we as a family will always be united for you. We will love and miss you for now, for always and forever.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article