The jury in the trial of a man accused of murdering his best friend on Christmas Eve has retired to consider its verdicts.
Dylan Thomas, 24, is accused of repeatedly stabbing William Bush, 23, in a “frenzied attack” on December 24 last year at their home in Llandaff, Cardiff.
Thomas has admitted manslaughter by diminished responsibility but denies murder.
Mr Bush and Thomas had been friends since they were about 13, having met at Christ College Brecon, a private boarding and day school in mid-Wales.
Thomas was described to the jury as being “something of a loner” while Mr Bush was more outgoing and active. His brother called him a “loyal” friend.
Mr Bush sustained 37 stab wounds in the attack, including 16 to the neck, while Thomas had cuts to the palms of his hands, which he told police he received while trying to defend himself.
Thomas appeared before Cardiff Crown Court on Thursday by video link from Ashworth Hospital Liverpool, where he is in custody and being treated for schizophrenia.
During the trial, the jury heard from Dr Panchu Xavier, a consultant forensic psychiatrist at Ashworth, who said the defendant could have been having a psychotic episode during the attack and for “up to six months before the event”.
The jury also heard Thomas had been arrested for breaking into Buckingham Palace a few months before the attack on Mr Bush.
Thomas told officers he was looking for “energy fields” between the palace and Cleopatra’s Needle, an obelisk in central London.
He was rugby-tackled by an officer after he told them he was “over now so you may as well show me round”.
Sending the jury out on Thursday, judge Mrs Justice Steyn KC said they may take as long as they need to reach a verdict in the case.
The defence has argued throughout the case that Thomas was mentally unwell at the time of the incident, saying there was a “gamut” of signs of psychosis.
The prosecution disagreed, saying he showed “clear thinking” ahead of the attack.
Greg Bull KC, for the prosecution, said on Wednesday that Thomas was not experiencing voices that told him to kill Mr Bush, as can happen in other cases of schizophrenia, and his searches for the veins and arteries of the neck suggested intent.
Orlando Pownall KC, for the defence, previously said the only explanation for the defendant’s actions was his mental state, and there was no “discernible motive” in the case.
Addressing the jury, he said: “You must acquit if you think there is a mental health explanation.”
The trial continues.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article