New figures revealing an increase in the number of young people not in education, a job or training show that their future is being “eroded”, it has been warned.
The Office for National Statistics (ONS) estimated that 13.2% of all people aged 16 to 24 in the UK were not in education, employment or training (Neet) in July to September 2024, up on the previous quarter and on the same time last year.
An estimated 15.1% of young men and 11.2% of young women were said to be Neet, giving a total of 946,000.
The TUC said the number had increased by 9% over the past year.
General secretary Paul Nowak said: “Every young person needs a good start to their working life, to set them on a path of opportunity and security, but what we are seeing today is that young people are paying the price of the Tories’ toxic economic legacy.
“Extended periods of unemployment can severely affect the long-term career prospects and financial stability of young people.
“Young people up and down the country are facing the same cost-of-living crisis as everybody else. So long periods without earning have the very real potential to push more into poverty.
“We welcome Labour’s youth guarantee commitment. It is vital that these plans offer young people good quality training and access to decent, paid work.”
Russell Hobby, chief executive of charity Teach First, said: “With 13.2% of young people not in education, employment or training, we’re witnessing the erosion of their futures before our eyes.
“We know that the proportion of these young people from disadvantaged backgrounds remains unacceptably high, as unequal opportunities early on shut the door on future careers.”
Dr Andrea Barry, principal economist at the Youth Futures Foundation, said: “The ongoing unemployment crisis has left hundreds of thousands of young people experiencing the scarring effects of being left out of opportunities to earn or learn at a young age, damaging their future prospects.”
Stephen Evans, chief executive at the Learning and Work Institute, said: “The number of young people not in education, employment or training is estimated to be at its highest level in a decade. The number of Neets has risen by 150,000 since the pandemic, a 20% rise.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here