There are “proper processes” to be followed if International Criminal Court (ICC) investigations ever become a matter for the UK, the Home Secretary has said.
Yvette Cooper declined to say whether Israeli prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu would be arrested if he came to the UK, after warrants were issued by the ICC for Mr Netanyahu and his former defence minister Yoav Gallant over alleged war crimes in Gaza.
Asked whether Mr Netanyahu would be arrested in the UK, Ms Cooper told on Sky News on Friday morning: “That’s not a matter for me as Home Secretary.
“The International Criminal Court is of course independent and we respect its independence and the role that it has to play.”
She said the “overwhelming majority” of ICC investigations “never” become a matter for the British legal system or government, and added: “In any case, where they ever do there are proper processes that need to be followed and therefore it wouldn’t be appropriate for me to comment on those.
“What I can say is that obviously the UK Government’s position remains that we believe the focus should be on getting a ceasefire in Gaza.”
Downing Street backed the ICC on Thursday after it issued the arrest warrants, saying the Government respected the independence of the court.
The ICC also issued a warrant for Mohammed Deif, head of Hamas’s armed wing, over the October 7 2023 attacks that triggered Israel’s offensive in Gaza.
The Prime Minister’s official spokesman said the ICC, based in The Hague, Netherlands, is “the primary international institution for investigating and prosecuting the most serious crimes of international concern”.
A domestic court process would be required before Mr Netanyahu faced arrest if he set foot in the UK.
The spokesman also declined to get into “hypotheticals” when asked on Thursday whether Mr Netanyahu would be arrested if he came to the UK.
Shadow foreign secretary Dame Priti Patel described the warrants as “concerning and provocative” and called on the Government to “condemn” them.
Dame Priti criticised the ICC for drawing a “moral equivalence” between Israel’s actions in Gaza and the Hamas terrorist atrocity on October 7 2023.
She said: “The Labour Government must condemn and challenge the ICC’s decision.”
Before the general election in July, Tory ministers had been considering a legal challenge to the issuing of arrest warrants, but the Labour administration dropped that idea, saying it was a matter for the court.
The ICC said there are “reasonable grounds to believe” that Mr Netanyahu and Mr Gallant were responsible for “the war crime of starvation as a method of warfare, and the crimes against humanity of murder, persecution and other inhumane acts”.
The court’s pre-trial chamber also found “reasonable grounds to believe that Mr Netanyahu and Mr Gallant each bear criminal responsibility as civilian superiors for the war crime of intentionally directing an attack against the civilian population”.
The impact of the warrants is likely to be limited since Israel and its major ally, the US, are not members of the ICC.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here