Three men have been found guilty of the murder of Ian Ogle in Belfast.
Mr Ogle was 45 when he was beaten and stabbed 11 times just yards from his Cluan Place home in the east of the city in January 2019.
Delivering his verdict in the non-jury trial, Mr Justice McFarland said he was satisfied that Glenn Rainey, 38, from Ballyhalbert Caravan Park, Walter Ervine, 43, from Litchfield Street in Belfast and 41-year-old Robert Spiers from Millars Park in Dundonald were part of a group of five men who had carried out the attack.
The judge told the three men the only sentence he could hand down was life imprisonment.
There were cheers from the Ogle family when the verdict was announced at Belfast Crown Court on Friday.
The three defendants showed no emotion as the verdicts were read.
Two men had previously admitted killing Mr Ogle. Jonathan Brown, 39, from Whinney Hill in Dundonald, and 45-year-old Mark Sewell of Glenmount Drive in Newtownabbey were handed life sentences earlier this year.
Delivering his judgment, the judge said there had an “ongoing feud” between two factions in east Belfast after some of the defendants were involved in an incident in a bar with Mr Ogle’s son in 2017.
On the evening Ian Ogle was attacked, he and his son had been involved in an assault on another man on the Beersbridge Road. The judge said this had been a precipitating factor in the fatal attack later that night.
CCTV footage indicated Mr Ogle had been the victim of a 30-second attack, the judge said. Witnesses said Mr Ogle was attacked with a baton and a knife, and his head was stamped upon.
A local pastor, Kevin Sambrook, who had been speaking with Mr Ogle before the attack and gave evidence during the trial, described the group acting “like a pack of hyenas”, the judge said.
Mr Ogle died from a stab wound to the chest and had also suffered extensive bruising and a fractured skull.
Mr Justice McFarland said: “This is the classic joint enterprise case.
“The man who used the knife may have direct responsibility for the death but it is clear beyond any doubt that each of the five men were involved in the attack on Ian Ogle and each intended to cause him at the very least really serious bodily injury.”
He added the case against the three defendants was circumstantial and the prosecution case was made up of a number of strands.
Considering the evidence, the judge said a strong inference could be drawn from the mobile phone activity between the defendants on the night of the murder.
He said: “The overwhelming inference that can be drawn from the telephony evidence is that Brown, Sewell, Rainey, Ervine and Spiers made up the group that murdered Ian Ogle.”
Mr Justice McFarland also said the fact two of the defendants had both left Northern Ireland the day after the murder – Rainey flew to Thailand via Moscow and Ervine sailed to Scotland – was a strong contributory piece of evidence against them.
The judge said police had recovered an Ernesto knife and an extendable baton from the Connswater river two weeks after the murder. He said a search of Spiers’s house revealed an Ernesto knife missing from a set.
The judge also said Spiers had lied to the police about not having a mobile phone.
Mr Justice McFarland said he also drew an inference from the fact none of the three defendants had given evidence in the trial to answer evidence against them.
The judge concluded: “I am satisfied beyond reasonable doubt that Rainey, Ervine and Spiers were part of the group, the others being Brown and Sewell, that murdered Ian Ogle at Cluan Place.”
Addressing the defendants, he said: “The only sentence I can pass is life imprisonment and I now pass that sentence.”
The judge said a tariff hearing to determine the minimum amount of time each would spent in prison would he held in July.
Before the three were led from the dock, Spiers blew a kiss to someone in the public gallery.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here