Top bankers in the UK could be able to cash in their bonuses sooner, and fewer may be subject to pay restrictions, as UK regulators move to relax rules for the financial sector post-Brexit.
The Bank of England’s regulatory arm, the Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA), and the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) set out the plans to reduce red tape.
Proposed changes will see the period that bonus payments can be deferred for the most senior bankers reduced from eight years to five years.
Deferrals are when bonuses for staff are paid out in future, rather than immediately, and can be cancelled if the performance of the business changes.
Shortening the deferral period – which for less senior bankers would be reduced to four years – means people can receive the cash faster.
The regulators said this change would make the UK a more attractive place to work, because current deferral periods are typically longer than in some other countries.
“These proposals on bankers’ bonuses will support UK growth and competitiveness without undermining financial stability,” said Sam Woods, chief executive of the PRA.
“We should not return to the very dangerous pay structures that were commonly in place before 2008, but these proposals will reduce bureaucracy and support responsible risk-taking.”
The latest proposals follow last year’s decision to axe the cap on bonus payouts for top City bankers, which was previously limited to twice the level of fixed pay.
Mr Woods recently said the bonus cap was “clearly damaging for competitiveness” because it made it harder for UK-based banks to bring in top talent from abroad.
The PRA and FCA also propose scrapping some of the criteria that mean bankers must be identified as material risk-takers (MRTs), meaning their work has a material impact on the bank’s level of risk.
The regulators said the current criteria mean some people can be wrongly categorised as MRTs and be unnecessarily subject to restrictions on their pay.
Simplifying the process would give banks less rule, and therefore more flexibility to decide which employees they think identify as MRTs, according to the proposals.
Harvey Knight, head of the UK financial services regulatory team at law firm Withers, said it was an “encouraging development that the long overhang from the financial crisis of some 15 years ago is at last being reduced”.
“It was always an overly punitive sanction to subject bankers’ remuneration to such long periods of deferral of up to eight years,” which he said encouraged a laid-back attitude to spotting potential issues before bonuses are paid.
Simon Youel, head of policy and advocacy at campaign group Positive Money, said: “It seems a bizarre time for the Bank of England to loosen restrictions on bankers’ bonuses, given the governor’s recent warnings about the risks of complacency since the last financial crisis.
“Bankers’ bonuses are widely acknowledged to have fuelled the excessive risk-taking that previously crashed the economy, and more money wasted on bonuses means less capital for banks to invest productively in the economy.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here