Bruising on a toddler’s ear which was seen the day before he was allegedly shaken to death was not the result of an accident, a murder trial has been told.
Charlie Roberts was one year and 10 months when he suffered a non-survivable head injury at his home in Darlington in January.
His mother Paula Roberts, 41, was out for an eye test and the little boy was in the sole care of her partner Christopher Stockton, 38, at the time, Teesside Crown Court has heard.
Stockton denies murder and child neglect.
Roberts faces a single charge of child neglect, which she denies, in relation to injuries Charlie allegedly suffered prior to his death.
The day before, Roberts had told her brother that Charlie had suffered bruised ears when he lay down in his toy box while sleep-walking.
Dr Deborah Stalker, an expert paediatrician and specialist in child protection, studied photos of Charlie in the months before his death, the reports of medical experts and post-mortem images.
She told the jury she did not believe that Charlie suffered the bruised ear while sleep-walking.
She said: “In my opinion, this is a non-accidental injury, by that I mean it is a purposefully-inflicted injury.
“Accidental injuries to the ear are very rare.”
She explained that the shoulder or head usually take the impact of a fall, rather than an ear.
“To injure the ear with the type of injuries that you see on Charlie’s ear requires a direct blow,” Dr Stalker said.
She dismissed the claim that Charlie could have bruised an ear while sleep-walking, saying: “Simple falls do not cause ear injuries.
“There has to be a direct force to bruise an ear, that doesn’t happen from a domestic tumble whether awake or asleep.”
She said bruising would have been “very uncomfortable” and it would cause the ear to throb.
The court has heard that Stockton was not Charlie’s father and he had been in a relationship with the toddler’s mother for about 10 months when the little boy died.
The case continues.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article