Ministers should consider higher taxes on wealth such as inheritance tax as its value has far outstripped the growth in wages, a report has said.
Another means of tackling the unfairness of “Big Wealth” would be to provide a better safety net for the least well-off, such as more affordable homes and adult social care, according to the Institute for Public Policy Research (IPPR).
Tom Clark, author of the progressive think tank’s latest report, said attempts by the Labour Government to address wealth inequality had already run “into an almighty backlash”.
But he said ministers should continue this work as it could help those who do not have family wealth to succeed in their careers, get on the property ladder and earn more money.
Mr Clark, a journalist specialising in social sciences, said: “Wealth begets wealth, and the children of the very wealthy don’t just inherit more, but thanks to gold-plated education, introductions to the right social circles and financial cushioning that enables them to take more chances in their careers, they will also earn more and have better life chances to spend their time as they wish.”
Ministers have been criticised over plans announced at the Budget which will bring farmers into paying inheritance tax on property worth more than £1 million, when they previously benefitted from a tax break.
Plans to charge VAT on the fees of private schools have also come under fire from the Government’s political opponents.
Mr Clark added: “The first budget of the new Labour Government took a few extremely tentative steps to address some of the issues associated with ‘Big Wealth’, and even that is running into an almighty backlash. However the reality is that a lot more still needs to be done.”
The IPPR report says earnings from wealth – storing value in things like property, stocks and shares – is fast outstripping the value of earning cash from a job.
The wealthiest 10% own 57% of wealth in the UK, while the bottom 30% own little more than £1 in every £100, according to the think tank’s analysis.
If not addressed, the IPPR warns the divide between “have-a-lots” and “have-nots” will grow and block opportunities for millions.
A decrease in homeownership among younger generations is an example of this widening divide, the report said.
Alongside a suggestion to make “Big Wealth pay its way”, or provide a better safety net, the think tank’s report says ministers could take further steps to differentiate between “good wealth” and “bad wealth”.
This would require the Government to take steps to support wealth derived from productive and sustainable assets instead of wealth accumulated through inflationary gains on property and finance.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here