A jury has retired to consider its verdicts in the trial of a couple who buried their three-year-old son’s body in their back garden after allegedly subjecting him to “breathtaking” cruelty.
Tai and Naiyahmi Yasharahyalah, aged 42 and 43 respectively, both deny causing or allowing the death of Abiyah Yasharahyalah, whose skeletal remains were discovered in December 2022 at their former home in Clarence Road, Handsworth, Birmingham.
A trial at Coventry Crown Court has been told that Abiyah died after a respiratory illness in January 2020, at a time when he was suffering from bone fractures, severe malnutrition, rickets, anaemia, stunted growth and severe dental decay.
His parents also deny perverting the course of justice and child cruelty by failing to provide adequate nourishment or summon medical care.
Prosecutors allege it would have been obvious to both defendants, who had their own belief system including a “restrictive” vegan diet which also left them with health problems, that Abiyah was in considerable pain before his death.
Former fitness instructor Tai Yasharahyalah told the trial he now accepts he was neglectful towards Abiyah but did not realise at the time that his son needed any medical care.
His wife also denies acting “wilfully” in failing to summon medical help, claiming Abiyah’s body was buried in the hope he might be “born again” and not in order to hide the death from the authorities.
She also maintains that she did not think about going to a doctor because she had “renounced her citizenship” and was “not contracted to the state”.
Jurors in the case retired on Wednesday and were told not to feel under any pressure of time in reaching their conclusions.
After completing his summing up of the evidence in the case, trial judge Mr Justice Wall told them: “You are here to reach the right verdict and you will take as much or as little time as you need in order to do that.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article