An X user reposted a comment and image from a fellow contributor on the platform which showed a snapshot of data of those who signed a petition calling for another general election.
In their repost, they wrote: “Hey look their fantastic petition is so good even Keir Starmer has signed 584 times so far. Check out some of the other names Bridget Phillipson 1659 – she must hate her job.”
Evaluation
Both Sir Keir Starmer and Bridget Phillipson did not sign the petition multiple times. The data shows how many signatures have been recorded from their constituencies, and those of other MPs.
The facts
When viewing the petition in question, a section called ‘about petition data’ can be found at the bottom of the page, which reads: “The data shows the number of people who have signed the petition by country as well as in the constituency of each Member of Parliament.”
In the case of Sir Keir, the 584 figure means there were 584 signatures recorded as coming from his constituency of Holborn and St Pancras. The same logic applies to the figure of 1,659 recorded for Ms Phillipson’s constituency of Houghton and Sunderland South, as well as the other MPs in the snapshot of the petition reposted by the X user.
On the petition page, users can click to “get petition data” in json format.
This data shows that since the repost, the number of signatures recorded for both Sir Keir and Ms Phillipson’s constituencies have increased – and are likely to rise further. At the time of writing, the number of signatures for Sir Keir’s constituency was 2,114 and Ms Phillipson’s, 5,837.
Links
Post check is based on (archived)
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel