Foreign Secretary David Lammy has said he and the Prime Minister were “absolutely clear” that the UK will “not be making cash transfers and payments” in relation to reparations over the slave trade.
However, they are “happy to have the dialogue” around other issues relating to the future.
He made the comments to a cross-party committee of MPs, and it comes just weeks after the issue dominated the Commonwealth Heads of Government meeting (CHOGM) in Samoa.
Answering questions at the Foreign Affairs committee over discussions about the matter at last month’s summit, Mr Lammy said the nature of the conversations focused on climate finance and tech investment.
He said: “There was no discussion about reparation and money, and the Prime Minister and I were absolutely clear that we will not be making cash transfers and payments to the Caribbean.
“We are absolutely happy to have the dialogue about the future, our future relationships, and we will continue with those.”
He said that the phrase “reparations” was not in the communique from the summit. The phrase reparatory justice was in the communique.
“There’s a caricature about sending cash and I have rejected that caricature,” Mr Lammy added.
The communique published at the end of the summit signed by leaders acknowledged calls for a discussion on “reparatory justice” and said they “agreed that the time has come for a meaningful, truthful and respectful conversation towards forging a common future based on equity”.
Sir Keir had steered away from calls for reparations during the conference and had insisted it was not on the UK’s agenda, despite calls from Caribbean and African member states for discussions on the issue.
Speaking at an executive session of the summit in Samoa in October, the Prime Minister said it was important to acknowledge a “hard” shared history, and that he understood the “strength of feeling” about reparations.
Speaking alongside other leaders, he said: “We must also acknowledge our shared history – especially when it’s hard.
“I understand the strength of feeling here and that there are some calls to face up to the harms and injustices of the past through reparatory justice.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel