A top Romanian court has asked the official electoral authority to recount and verify all of the ballots cast in the first round of the presidential election.
The Constitutional Court in Bucharest voted unanimously in favour of the recount, and said the decision is final.
The Central Election Bureau is scheduled to meet on Thursday afternoon to discuss the request.
Calin Georgescu, a little-known, far-right populist, won the first round in the election, beating the incumbent prime minister.
Mr Georgescu, who ran independently, was due to face reformist Elena Lasconi in a December 8 run-off.
Pre-election surveys predicted he would win less than 10% of the vote.
Mr Georgescu’s unexpected success has prompted nightly protests by people who are concerned with previous remarks he has made in praise of Romanian fascist and nationalist leaders as well as Russian President Vladimir Putin, and believe he poses a threat to democracy.
The vote recount was prompted by a complaint made by Cristian Terhes, a former presidential candidate of the Romanian National Conservative Party who obtained 1% of the vote, who alleged that the USR had urged people to vote before some diaspora polls had closed on Sunday, saying it violated electoral laws against campaign activities on polling day.
After the CCR’s ruling, Mr Terhes’ press office said in a statement on Facebook that the court ordered the recount “due to indications of fraud”, and alleged Mr Terhes had “presented evidence suggesting” that valid votes cast for Ludovic Orban = who had dropped out of the race but remained on the ballot – had been reassigned to Ms Lasconi.
It is the first time in Romania’s 35-year post-communist history that the country’s most powerful party, the PSD, did not have a candidate in the second round of a presidential race. Prime Minister Marcel Ciolacu resigned as PSD party leader after he narrowly lost to Ms Lasconi by just 2,740 votes.
Ms Lasconi criticised the CCR’s decision, saying “Extremism is fought by voting, not backstage games.
“What the CCR is trying to do now is absolutely horrific for a democratic country,” she said.
“I am here to defend democracy and call on the Central Election Bureau to handle the vote recount wisely. The law must be the same for all, not interpreted differently for some.”
Ms Lasconi, a former journalist, had told The Associated Press ahead of the first-round vote that she saw corruption as one of Romania’s biggest issues and vowed to tackle it.
“Romania deserves better, not a group of old politicians who use institutions strictly for their personal interest,” Ms Lasconi added on Thursday.
The CCR also rejected a request by another unsuccessful first-round candidate, Sebastian Popescu, to annul the ballot.
He alleged Mr Georgescu – who declared zero campaign spending – had not disclosed financing linked to a massive TikTok campaign, which many have credited for his success.
Mr Popescu, who got 0.15% in the first round, also alleged in his appeal that Mr Georgescu had used widespread disinformation and “defrauded the electoral law by illegally financing the entire electoral campaign, having support from outside the country’s borders, from state entities with the aim of destabilizing Romania”.
Mr Georgescu, who said a network of Romanian volunteers helped his campaign, has denied any wrongdoing.
“They want to ban the right of the Romanian people to speak freely,” he told a local news channel, adding the first-round vote “was perfectly democratic and legitimate”.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here