Russia’s block on a ceasefire motion for Sudan will not deter the UK from seeking civilian protections, a Foreign Office minister has pledged.
On Thursday Anneliese Dodds described the conflict in northern Africa as “devastating” and said Westminster is “using every lever” to ease suffering.
Fighting broke in Sudan in April 2023, after tensions between its military and paramilitary leaders erupted in the capital Khartoum and spread to other regions, including western Darfur.
UK Foreign Secretary David Lammy chaired a UN Security Council session earlier this month on a joint UK-Sierra Leone draft resolution calling for a national ceasefire, which also aimed to support protections for civilians and the unrestricted passage of aid.
But Russia used its veto to block the proposal on November 18, accusing the UK of “neo-colonialism”, with its first deputy permanent representative to the UN Dmitry Polyanskiy labelling the British efforts “nothing but an attempt to give themselves an opportunity to meddle in Sudanese affairs”.
In a House of Commons statement, Ms Dodds told MPs: “Eighteen months into this devastating conflict, the war that began as a power struggle between the Sudanese Armed Forces and the Rapid Support Forces (RSF) has become one of the world’s worst humanitarian catastrophes.
“Nearly 25 million people – half of Sudan’s population – are in urgent need of humanitarian assistance. Sudan’s neighbours are also struggling under the strain of hundreds of thousands of refugees.
“The UK is using every lever, including through our role in the UN Security Council, to convene the international community to alleviate suffering, pursue peace, and hold those responsible for atrocities to account.”
On efforts to secure protections for civilians and full, unimpeded aid access, the development minister continued: “I am appalled that one country chose to block this vital resolution.
“Russia’s veto is a disgrace but let me be clear – Russia’s actions will not deter us.”
She confirmed the UK had put together a new £113 million aid package to support people in Sudan and those who have fled to neighbouring countries like Chad and South Sudan, which she said had doubled the UK’s aid commitment to the region.
Ms Dodds later said she hoped “the very loud and clear message is now being sent that there is cross-party concern about this situation” after Conservative shadow Foreign Office minister Wendy Morton told the Commons: “The situation in Sudan is unconscionable.
“Red lines are being crossed in the prosecution of this conflict, that countries like the UK – which is a penholder on Sudan at the UN Security Council – cannot allow to stand.”
Ms Morton continued: “Our position remains that there must be an immediate cessation of hostilities. We understand that the Government’s resolution at the UN Security Council with Sierra Leone was thwarted by Russia, however, we would welcome a further update on other avenues the Government is actively pursuing including to back the Jeddah process.”
Warring parties, including the Sudanese Armed Forces and the RSF, along with the US and Saudi governments, committed to prioritising discussions to achieve a short-term ceasefire in May last year.
Ms Dodds warned it “has been extremely frustrating that we have not seen all the parties to the conflict engaging in those attempts to broker peace” and urged participation, else parties risked “effectively leading to a humanitarian emergency within Sudan because of their failure to engage with those processes”.
Liberal Democrat MP Brian Mathew, a member of the International Development Committee, asked Ms Dodds: “Does the minister also agree that we should not be bestowing legitimacy on warring groups?
“I understand that the RSF are days away from claiming that they are forming a government. If they do, does the minister agree that it is civilians who will lose out?”
The minister replied: “All warring parties must be prioritising taking part in the talks that are so necessary to end this conflict.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel