London Fire Brigade (LFB) has made “significant improvements” in performance since 2022, the fire inspectorate has said.
His Majesty’s Inspectorate of Constabulary and Fire & Rescue Services (HMICFRS) said in a review published on Friday that LFB is “outstanding” at responding to major incidents, praising the brigade’s “significant” role in counterterrorism.
In 2022, HMICFRS found that the fire service required improvement in effectively and efficiently keeping people safe and secure from fires, as well as looking after its staff.
In the same year, it placed LFB under special measures after an independent review found that the fire service was “institutionally misogynist and racist”.
It was taken out of the enhanced level of monitoring earlier this year.
London fire commissioner Andy Roe said the latest report “provides a clear assessment of the positive change” the brigade has made.
HMICFRS said the brigade has significantly improved its ability to respond effectively to a terrorist attack through investment in equipment and training and that it has a “good system” for home fire safety visits.
It also said that LFB is making “good progress” in its efforts to improve culture.
However, the brigade was urged to do more to recruit a more diverse workforce and to improve and build staff trust and confidence when dealing with poor behaviour.
His Majesty’s Inspector of Fire and Rescue Services Lee Freeman said he was “pleased” to find the improvements, saying the brigade has a better understanding of risk and emergencies.
He went on: “It also continues to respond quickly to fires, and we have graded it as outstanding in responding to major and multi-agency incidents.
“However, it still needs to improve how it identifies and develops high-potential staff and how it manages individual performance and development reviews.
“While there is still more to do, it is evident that the brigade understands where to make these further improvements and has achievable plans for them.”
Mr Roe said the brigade is working to “transform” the culture of the organisation.
He added: “We are committed to maintaining our progress over future years, delivering further change, and ensuring that we provide the service that our staff and our communities deserve.
“This is not the end of our journey, and every day we will strive to do better to ensure we remain trusted to serve and protect London.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here