The inquest into the deaths of four men killed in a South Wales mining disaster 13 years ago will have a “forensic and laser-like focus” in answering key questions about the case, a coroner has said.
Garry Jenkins, 39, Philip Hill, 44, David Powell, 50, and Charles Breslin, 62, were killed when thousands of gallons of water flooded the Gleision drift mine, near Pontardawe, a town in the Swansea valley, on September 15 2011.
Seven men were working in the tunnels that day and only three survived.
The mine’s site manager, Malcolm Fyfield, and the company that ran the mine, MNS Mining Ltd, were acquitted of gross negligence manslaughter by a jury at Swansea Crown Court in 2014.
Following the trial, the victims’ families successfully campaigned for a full inquest into the deaths and this was opened in December 2022.
A pre-inquest review hearing took place at Swansea Guildhall on Friday in front of Edward Ramsay, assistant coroner for Swansea and Neath Port Talbot.
Mr Ramsay told the court that members of the victims’ families had attended the hearing in person and online.
“I want to acknowledge them – their grief, their loss,” he said.
“I want to thank them for their attendance today. I want to reassure them.
“There will be nothing slip slop or perfunctory about this inquest.
“I am already of the view that this inquest needs a forensic and laser-like focus on answering where the water came from and who, if anyone, knew or ought to have known it was there.”
The coroner said he had been studying documents about the case including those relating to the criminal trial, and detailed maps of the area.
He told the court: “No stone will be left unturned. I will go wherever the evidence takes me.”
A further pre-inquest review hearing has been scheduled for April 25 next year, with further such hearings expected to take place before the full inquest.
The disaster happened after a routine blasting, and the families and friends of those trapped waited for hours inside Rhos Community Centre nearby as divers searched in vain for survivors in the murky, dark water.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel