MPs ran out of time to debate whether the UK should recognise the state of Palestine.
Independent MP Shockat Adam (Leicester South) had seconds left at the end of Parliament’s Friday sitting to present his Palestine Statehood (Recognition) (No 2) Bill, and lost his opportunity to make the case for the law change.
The pro-Gaza MP’s Bill was rescheduled for debate on January 24, but is unlikely to be considered as it now falls to the bottom of the list of private members’ Bills, the law reforms individual MPs champion outside the Government’s agenda.
The Bill would have recognised a Palestinian state based on borders agreed before 1967, and would have also conferred full diplomatic status to Palestine’s mission to the UK.
As the Commons reached the end of a Friday dominated by a Bill aimed at legalising assisted dying for terminally ill people, two animal rights-related Bills were also given the backing of MPs.
Attempts to crack down on puppy and kitten smuggling, as well as illegal importation of ferrets, won the backing of the Government and passed its second reading.
Lib Dem MPs in the chamber clapped when the Animal Welfare (Import of Dogs, Cats and Ferrets) Bill cleared the parliamentary hurdle.
“How dare we clap,” Commons Speaker Sir Lindsay Hoyle said as he reprimanded them.
Sir Lindsay also joked that he had “had enough with Roger”, as he addressed the clapping.
The Who’s Roger Daltrey was reprimanded by the Speaker on Wednesday, when he was heard clapping in the Commons gallery during Prime Minister’s Questions.
A Bill aimed at tightening the law around livestock worrying, the Dogs (Protection of Livestock) (Amendment) Bill, was also nodded through to its next stage by MPs.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here