The Metropolitan Police has apologised for sending an email that named alleged victims of the Westminster honeytrap scandal to each other.
The force said it had referred itself to the Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO) after an email relating to the ongoing investigation was “sent in error” on Friday.
Reports have said alleged victims’ email addresses were viewable to each other in the message, instead of being hidden.
The Metropolitan Police said officers would “personally apologise” to those affected.
On Friday evening, the ICO said the Metropolitan Police had “made us aware of an incident”, adding that it would “assess the information provided”.
In a statement, a Met spokesperson said: “An email relating to an ongoing investigation was sent in error today.
“We recognise the impact on those involved and apologise sincerely for any distress.
“A referral to the Information Commissioner’s Office has been made and we await advice on next steps.
“Officers will be reaching out to those impacted to personally apologise and provide reassurance.”
Police launched a probe earlier this year after it was reported that a number of men with links to Westminster had received unsolicited messages from a figure claiming to be called “Charlie” or “Abi”.
The fake accounts were allegedly engaged in a sophisticated scam designed to coax MPs and other figures in political circles into sending explicit pictures.
Former Conservative MP William Wragg resigned the party whip after he admitted giving politicians’ phone numbers to a suspected scammer.
In April, the Met confirmed it was investigating allegations of unsolicited explicit images and messages that had been sent.
An ICO spokesperson said: “People have the right to expect that organisations will handle their personal information securely and responsibly.
“If an individual has concerns about how their data has been handled they should raise it with the organisation, then report them to us if they are not satisfied with the response.
“The Metropolitan Police have made us aware of an incident and we will assess the information provided.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here