Nigel Farage has suggested holding a referendum on the future of the Chagos Islands as he claimed Donald Trump’s team is “appalled” at the UK’s “rotten” deal.
The Reform UK leader put forward the idea of allowing the Chagossian people to decide the future of their homeland as he joined other opposition MPs in raising concerns over the agreement to give up sovereignty of the Indian Ocean archipelago to Mauritius.
New Mauritian prime minister Navin Ramgoolam has asked for an independent review of the “confidential draft agreement agreed so far” while Mr Farage, who has strong ties with President-elect Mr Trump, has highlighted doubts from the Republican camp.
Defence minister Luke Pollard, responding to a Commons urgent question on Monday, claimed the deal is “strongly supported” by the US and protects the long-term future of the joint US-UK military base on Diego Garcia.
He added necessary safeguards will be in place to prevent China gaining a foothold in the area.
Mr Pollard said: “The agreement secures the effective operation on a joint facility on Diego Garcia well into the next century, the agreement is strongly supported by our closest friends and allies, including the United States. It has been supported by all relevant US departments and agencies following a rigorous scrutiny process.
“This base is a key part of UK-US defence relationship as it enables the United Kingdom and the United States to support operations that demonstrate our shared commitment to regional stability, provide rapid response to crises, and counter some of the most challenging security threats we face. The President of the United States (Joe Biden) applauded the agreement.”
He added: “There will be clear commitment in the treaty to robust security arrangements, including arrangements preventing the presence of foreign security forces on the outer islands so that the base can continue to operate securely and effectively.
“The operation of the base will continue unchanged, with strong protections from malign influence. For the first time in 50 years, the base will be undisputed and legally secure.”
Mr Farage told the chamber: “The presentation of what the American administration believes is a fantasy. Joe Biden is going, in fact many think he’s gone already.
“I’ve been contacted by very senior officials and advisers from the incoming Republican administration and every single one of them is appalled at this deal, they know the leasehold agreement will not survive, just as the deal with China over Hong Kong didn’t survive.
“Hasn’t the time come for the Government to admit this is a rotten deal for the UK, a rotten deal for America and an even worse deal for the Chagossians?
“And if you care so much about the sovereignty of the Falklands being in the hands of the Falkland Islanders, why not have a referendum of the Chagossians and ask them to settle who should have sovereignty over those islands?”
Mr Pollard said “whipping up uncertainty” over the future of the Falklands is “not helpful”, adding: “The Falklands are British for as long as the people of the Falkland Islands want to be British.”
He added he is “certain” that MPs, the US and other allies will see the deal secures the future of the military base “well into the next century”.
Conservative MP Sir Julian Lewis (New Forest East) asked what there is in the agreement to prevent China putting “listening outposts on other islands that could compromise the security of Diego Garcia”.
Mr Pollard replied: “They are very specific arrangements in the treaty that prevent any foreign power putting security apparatus, security forces on any of the (outer) islands.”
On the review of the agreement by Mauritius, Mr Pollard said: “It’s quite normal, I think, for any new government to look again at a deal signed by immediate predecessors.”
At this point Tory MPs shouted: “What about the US?”
Mr Pollard added: “The reason I say that is when they look at the deal, the detail of this deal will be convincing – just as it will be for our US friends because it’s a deal backed by the entirety of the US security apparatus.”
Shadow defence secretary James Cartlidge earlier called on the Government to pause the deal until Mr Trump’s inauguration.
He said: “Whilst we would prefer the Government to cancel the whole deal, at the very least will he pause any further ratification until the new US administration’s in place, and the Mauritius government have concluded their review?”
Chagossians were forced to leave the central Indian Ocean territory by 1973 to make way for the military base.
The expulsions are regarded as one of the most shameful parts of Britain’s modern colonial history and Chagossians have spent decades fighting to return to the islands.
The United Nations’ highest court, the International Court of Justice, previously ruled the UK’s administration of the territory was “unlawful” and must end.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel