French Prime Minister Michel Barnier is bracing for a no-confidence vote this week, a political reckoning almost certain to topple his fragile government and send shockwaves across the eurozone.
On Monday, Mr Barnier invoked a special constitutional tool to push through the controversial 2025 budget without a parliamentary vote.
Mr Barnier argued it was necessary to maintain “stability” amid deep political divisions.
The move immediately drew sharp backlash, with Marine Le Pen’s National Rally and the leftist France Unbowed both filing no-confidence motions in response, setting the stage for a vote as early as Wednesday, which could bring down the fragile government.
The decision comes as France grapples with a fractured National Assembly following snap elections in June, which left no party or coalition with a majority.
President Emmanuel Macron appointed Mr Barnier in September to break the deadlock and tackle the country’s ballooning deficit.
However, his austerity budget— featuring 40 billion euros in cuts and 20 billion euros in tax hikes — has been widely criticised, escalating tensions in the lower house.
The use of the tool, called Article 49.3, allows the government to pass legislation without a parliamentary vote but leaves it exposed to no-confidence motions.
Opposition leaders argue that Mr Barnier’s concessions, including scrapping an electricity tax hike, do not go far enough to address their concerns.
Ms Le Pen accused Mr Barnier of ignoring her party’s demands.
“Everyone must shoulder their responsibilities,” she said.
The political standoff has unsettled financial markets, with borrowing costs rising sharply amid fears of prolonged instability.
Mr Barnier warned of “serious turbulence” if the budget isn’t passed, but critics dismissed his remarks as fear-mongering.
If the no-confidence motion succeeds, Mr Macron will remain president but will need to appoint a new prime minister to steer legislation through the fractured assembly.
The uncertainty threatens to deepen France’s economic troubles and reverberate across the eurozone.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel