China announced on Tuesday that it is banning exports to the United States of gallium, germanium, antimony and other key hi-tech materials with potential military applications.
The Chinese Commerce Ministry announced the move after Washington expanded its list of Chinese companies subject to export controls on computer chip-making equipment, software and high-bandwidth memory chips. Such chips are needed for advanced applications.
The ratcheting up of trade restrictions comes at a time when President-elect Donald Trump has been threatening to sharply raise tariffs on imports from China and other countries, potentially adding to simmering tensions over trade and technology.
China said in July 2023 that it would require exporters to apply for licences to send to the US the strategically important materials such as gallium and germanium.
In August, the Commerce Ministry said it would restrict exports of antimony, which is used in a wide range of products from batteries to weapons.
China is the biggest global source of gallium and germanium, which are produced in small amounts but are needed to make computer chips for mobile phones, cars and other products, as well as solar panels and military technology.
The Commerce Ministry protested and said it would act to protect China’s “rights and interests” after the US announced it was adding 140 companies to a so-called “entity list” subject to strict export controls. Nearly all are based in China, though some are Chinese-owned businesses in Japan, South Korea and Singapore.
Both governments said their respective export controls were needed for “national security”.
In hitting back at the latest move by Washington to slow China’s progress in developing advanced technology with potential military applications, China is tightening controls announced in July 2023.
China’s government has been frustrated by US curbs on access to advanced processor chips and other technology on security grounds but was cautious in retaliating, possibly to avoid disrupting China’s fledgling developers of chips, artificial intelligence and other technology.
Various Chinese industry associations issued statements protesting at the US move.
The China Association of Automobile Manufacturers said it opposes using national security as a grounds for export controls, “abuse of export control measures, and the malicious blockade and suppression of China”.
“Such behaviour seriously violates the laws of the market economy and the principle of fair competition, undermines the international economic and trade order, disrupts the stability of the global industrial chain, and ultimately harms the interests of all countries,” it said in a statement.
The China Semiconductor Industry Association issued a similar statement, adding that such restrictions are disrupting supply chains and inflating costs for American companies.
“US chip products are no longer safe and reliable. China’s related industries will have to be cautious in purchasing US chips,” it said.
The US gets about half its supply of both gallium and germanium metals directly from China, according to the US Geological Survey.
China exported about 23 metric tonnes of gallium last year and produces about 600 metric tonnes of germanium per year.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here