Attempts to make financial watchdogs prioritise economic growth could hurt consumers, MPs have heard, weeks after the Chancellor vowed to cut red tape to spur investment.
Helen Charlton, chair of the Financial Services Consumer Panel (FSCP), said a push for growth from regulators poses “a top risk to consumers”.
The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) has come under increasing pressure to impose fewer and less strict rules on firms, which some people see as an impediment to growth.
Chancellor Rachel Reeves recently promised to rip up financial red tape, arguing that regulatory changes following the 2008 economic crash have “gone too far”.
She said in November that measures brought in since the crisis to “eliminate risk” have had “unintended consequences” in holding back growth.
But consumer groups warned on Tuesday that prioritising growth could do more harm than good for ordinary people.
Ms Charlton, whose panel provides advice to the FCA, was speaking to the Treasury Select Committee of MPs.
She said her panel, which is independent of the FCA, is “constantly” telling the regulator “to remember that consumer protection is a primary objective”.
Ms Charlton said: “This should help growth. It’s not an anti-growth point.”
She added that “loose language around balancing and trade-offs” between consumer protection and encouraging investment is “really very damaging”.
Mick McAteer, co-director of consumer group the Financial Inclusion Centre, added that he had “never felt in the past that the Government was overly influencing the direction of regulators”.
But he added that prioritising growth, which is currently listed as a secondary goal of the FCA, is now “in danger of becoming almost like a de facto primary objective.”
Mr McAteer pointed to recent moves to water down regulation for insurance firms and on push payment fraud, among others, saying: “All of these things are building up.”
He added: “It feels now that in every sector, every sub-sector… this secondary growth objective is really starting to impinge on the freedom of the supposedly objective financial regulator.”
Mr McAteer said: “It isn’t just the FCA that’s under pressure, here.”
Ms Charlton and Mr McAteer’s comments came after financial trade bodies told the same committee of MPs that watchdogs should ease regulations.
Miles Celic, chief of industry group TheCityUK, said financial regulation is “all downside risk” and that officials should stop regulating “for risk and not for growth”.
He added that the Government’s plan to make the UK economy grow faster “is going to be impossible without the regulators leaning in behind it”.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here