The Government has announced that South Western Railway’s services will be the first to transfer into public ownership next year.
Ministers said the move paved the way for a “major shake-up” of Britain’s railways.
The Government said the transition to a publicly owned railway will improve reliability and support its number one priority of boosting economic growth by encouraging more people to use the railway.
It will also clamp down on “unacceptable levels” of delays, cancellations, and waste seen under decades of failing franchise contracts, it was claimed.
The Government said the change will save up to £150 million a year in fees alone by ensuring money is spent on services rather than private shareholders.
Today’s announcement will see services across southern England and East Anglia come back into public control by autumn 2025.
The Government said it delivers on Labour’s manifesto commitment to bring contracts with existing rail operators into public ownership as they expire without costing taxpayers a penny in compensation.
Transport Secretary Heidi Alexander said: “For too long, the British public have had to put up with rail services which simply don’t work. A complex system of private train operators has too often failed its users.
“Starting with journeys on South Western Railway, we’re switching tracks by bringing services back under public control to create a reliable rail network that puts customers first.
“Our broken railways are finally on the fast track to repair and rebuilding a system that the British public can trust and be proud of again.”
Mick Whelan, general secretary of Aslef, the train drivers’ union, said: “This is the right decision, at the right time, to take the brakes off the UK economy and rebuild Britain.
“John Major’s decision to privatise British Rail in 1994 was foolish, ideologically-driven, and doomed to fail. It was described even by that arch-privateer Margaret Thatcher as “a privatisation too far” and so it proved.
“The privateers have taken hundreds of millions of pounds from our railways and successive Conservative governments have pursued a policy of managed decline which has sold taxpayers, passengers, and staff short.”
Rail, Maritime and Transport union General Secretary Mick Lynch said: “This is a significant step forward for passengers, rail workers, and those who want to see an efficient rail system run for the public good, rather than private profit.
“Bringing infrastructure and passenger services under one employer in public ownership, means proper investment in operations, harmonising conditions for staff, and prioritising the needs of passengers.”
Gareth Bacon, the Conservative shadow transport secretary, said: “Labour have voted against our plan to strengthen the rights of passengers and commuters.
“We are concerned that the Government’s plans are simply an ideological undertaking that does not put passengers first.
“Keir Starmer’s latest Transport Secretary has a worrying record of failure when it comes to delivering projects on time that improve passenger services. We will closely monitor the impact of these plans.”
Transport Salaried Staffs’ Association general secretary Maryam Eslamdoust said: “This is an historic moment for the rail industry, marking the beginning of the end for the Tories’ failed privatisation experiment.
“The move will mean better value for taxpayers and better services for rail passengers. It recognises that railways should be run as a public service rather than as a cash cow for shareholders.
“We welcome the Labour Government’s recognition of the expertise and experience that railway staff – our members – possess are crucial to the changes they want to see in the sector.
“We look forward to working with them to deliver the 21st-century railway that Britain’s workers deserve.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel