Campaigners have welcomed money for affordable homes in the Scottish Budget, but say it merely reverses cuts in previous years.
Living Rent said the scale of the housing shortage means the £768 million pledged is only a “drop in the ocean”.
Last year’s budget included cuts to funding for housing and planning, which was condemned by a number of anti-poverty charities.
However this money was partially restored in April, during the final days of Humza Yousaf’s period as first minister.
During her speech outlining the Budget for 2025/26 on Wednesday, Finance Secretary Shona Robison said warm and safe houses are “critical” to tackling child poverty.
She said: “We are going to ramp up action on housing, investing £768 million in affordable homes.
“It enables over 8,000 new properties for social rent, mid-market rent and low-cost home ownership to be built or acquired this coming year, and returns spending to a higher level than it was two years ago.”
Aditi Jehangir, chairwoman of Living Rent, said: “Reversing the cuts to affordable housing is a long awaited sign that this Government is finally taking the housing emergency seriously.
Scotland needs more social housing.
The last decades have seen the decimation of council housing, through a lack of funding, stock transfer and right to buy.
At the budget today, MSPs must vote to dedicate more funds to ending Scotland's housing emergency. pic.twitter.com/4pIzcIDthr
— Living Rent (@Living_Rent) December 4, 2024
“The last decades have seen the decimation of council housing because of a lack of funding, stock transfer and right to buy.
“Unfortunately this is only a reverse of previous cuts made to the budget. As a result, it is a cut in real-terms when the housing crisis is ever expanding.
“Sadly, £768 million, or 8,000 homes, is just a drop in the ocean compared to what is needed.
“Right now there are nearly a quarter of a million people on waiting lists in Scotland.
“This Government needs to deliver more social housing by allocating greater funding for stock buyback and for social and council house building programmes, to ensure more people have a stable, secure, affordable place to live.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel