A fall in voter numbers may be tied to the growth in wealthy donors giving to political parties, an expert warned amid the launch of a new report into dirty money’s influence on politics.
Anti-corruption group Transparency International UK called for new light to be shed on the influence of big money on British politics, which it claimed has contributed to a “crisis point” for a lack of faith in the system and dwindling participation in elections.
Speaking at the launch of the campaign group’s latest report into dodgy donations, Parth Patel of the Institute For Public Policy Research suggested there was a “combined story here between falling turnout and the growing concentration of donations”.
“Turnout is falling in the long run, and that should be setting off more alarm bells than it actually does. Where the hell are all the voters going?” he said.
Voters see that the “returns on voting are declining”, he said, adding: “We are quickly approaching that tipping point where elections lose legitimacy because the majority didn’t take part.”
Transparency International’s report warns that some £115 million donations reported by political parties between 2001 and May 2024 have come from “unknown or questionable sources”, while £48.2 million has come from donors who have bought privileged access, influence or honours.
Donors involved in corruption, fraud or money laundering have given £42 million to British political parties, the group said, warning there is an “absence of real deterrent” from breaking the law around donations.
It called for lower spending limits for political parties during elections and leadership contests to end an “arms race” on donations.
Labour peer Dame Margaret Hodge told the audience at the event she wanted to see a new lower threshold for parties to declare any donations to the Electoral Commission.
Donations of more than £11,180 – whether from and individual or company – must currently be declared to the commission, whether these are in a single sum or spread out across a year.
Dame Margaret suggested even the sources of small donations of a few hundred pounds should be named and declared in order to “maximise transparency”.
Transparency International also recommended the Government brings forward an Elections Bill, to prevent cash from unknown origins entering British politics.
In its election manifesto, Labour promised to “restore confidence” in Government with new ethics commission ensuring ministers are upholding standards, and in politics more widely by “strengthening the rules around donations to political parties”.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here